icrn phw energy cse dte gobar times rwh csestore iep aaeti
Web Specials

‘Commercial interest cannot drive lake conservation in Bengaluru’

1 Comments
Date:Nov 19, 2011

High Court panel frowns on handing over of city lakes to private companies

Organised eatouts at the Nagawara Lake

The involvement of the private sector in the maintenance and restoration of Bengaluru lakes can be allowed only if there is no commercial interest involved, a panel appointed by the Karnataka High Court has said. A participation based solely on “consequential commercial interest” is not a solution for the development of the lakes in the city said the committee in its report recently submitted to the court. The report affirms concerns expressed in a public interest petition filed by the non-profit, Environment Support Group (ESG). The petition has challenged the management and conservation of the city lakes by private companies. 

A nine member committee, headed by high court judge N K Patil, was set up in 2010 to examine the ground realities and prepare action plan for preservation of the lakes
The panel’s report on the long term sustainability of the lakes of Bengaluru was submitted in March this year, which was accepted by the court
In an interim judgement in July 2011, the court requested the committee to frame a policy on public-private-partnership for rejuvenation and maintenance of the lakes
The report was submitted to the court in October. The report gave recommendations for the sustainability of the lakes in the city. The most important of these said: “under no condition commercial exploitation of the lake can take place”

Begaluru’s Lake Development Authority (LDA), a non profit organisation, was set up in 2002 by the state government of Karnataka, to regenerate and conserve the lakes in and around Bengaluru. But it started leasing out the lakes to private developers from 2004 due to shortage of funds, staff and other resources.

The Hebbal Lake was handed over to the Oberoi hotels group, the Nagawara to the Lumbini group, the Vengaiahkere to Par-C group and the Agara to the Biota group. K S Saibaba, chief executive officer of LDA, was reported saying that with the rise in urbanisation and severe encroachment of the catchment areas, public-private-partnership would ensure the protection of the existing water bodies and would help in further maintenance of the water quality and surrounding ambience. Various initiatives like fencing the lakes, desilting, desludging and plantation of ornamental trees around the lake bed had been carried out for the preservation of these four water bodies.

Oberoi wants to develop private hotel near lake

Leo F Saldanha, coordinator of ESG says that the lake authority is only looking at the aesthetic aspects of the lake and not the overall development of the catchment area. ESG believes that lakes are a public property and belong to the local people. Hebbal Lake, originally is a bird sanctuary, where the Oberoi group proposes to develop a private hotel. S Vishwanath, president of a Bengaluru based non-profit, Rainwater Club, adds that the livelihoods of many people depend on these water bodies and hence fencing them and charging entry fees is against public interest.

Recreational-area-for-the-public-at-the-Nagawara-lake

ESG brought the issue of privatisation of the lakes of Bengaluru to the attention of the high court in 2008. In response to the petition, a nine member committee was set up in 2010. The committee was given the charge of examining the ground realities and preparing an action plan for the preservation of lakes. The committee is headed by N K Patil, a judge of the Karnataka High Court. A report on the long term sustainability of the lakes of Bengaluru was submitted in March this year, which was accepted by the court. In an interim judgement in July 2011, the court requested the committee to frame a policy on public-private-partnership for rejuvenation and maintenance of the lakes. The committee was also asked to frame separate parameters for cases where there is no involvement of commercial interest as well as where the consequential commercial interest was involved.

The committee held five meetings with the stake holders before preparing the policy report. The report was submitted to the court in October. The report gave recommendations for the sustainability of the lakes in the city. The most important of these said: “under no condition commercial exploitation of the lake can take place”.

Public access cut off

ESG welcomed the suggestion of the court committee. These lakes have been a source of income generation for people residing in the surrounding areas, says Saldanha. Water from these water bodies are being used for agriculture. Many fishers living near these lakes have depended on them for fish, making it a very important source of livelihood generation. These lakes were also being used for domestic activities like bathing and washing by area residents. The lakes have also been used over the years by the people for holding rituals and religious ceremonies. With private control, these practices would erode. Concretisation of the surrounding lake area, establishment of commercial activities like restaurants and eateries, removal of natural vegetation and planting ornamental plants and also setting up of recreational zones would further damage the existing micro climate and ecosystem, and hence further increasing chances of flooding, says Saldanha.

On November 3 this year, the committee submitted its views to the principal bench of the high Court. The next date of hearing is December 14 next year when final decision on the privatisation of lakes will be given.

AddThis

The present water crises are alarming and needs immediate attention, innovative and creative strategies and interventions. The better option left is to go for rain water harvesting and development of watersheds. It is clear that the existing lakes in Bengaluru have to be conserved with need-based measures. The commercialisation of lake area should be optimised to safeguard the interest and objectives of the lakes. It is a fact that lakesstore water and cater to the needs of the people, both for drinking and irrigation. At the same time, it also supports recharge of groundwater, and thus works for the maintenance of sound ecosystem. The lake conservation measures should include: a) protection of catchment area to prevent the pollutants and flow of fresh rainwater, b) safeguarding the lake surroundings from all possible dumping and pollutants, c) better use of lakes for recreational and other community needs and d) checking and monitoring of groundwater in the surrounding areas. Use of need-based technologies and matching measures will certainly lead to the protection and conservation of lakes.

19 November 2011
Posted by
Lakshmi Narayana nagisetty

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


(Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.)
CSE WEBNET
Follow us ON
Follow grebbo on Twitter    Google Plus  DTE Youtube  rss