States opt for the green way
The Centre has no policy on organic farming but 10 states are promoting it
H R Jayaram gave up a prosperous law practice to set up The Green Path, India’s first organic hotel, in Bengaluru (Photographs: Latha Jishnu)Manoj Kumar Menon of the International Competence Centre for Organic Agriculture (ICCOA), a knowledge centre on organic agriculture, has an interesting story to relate on how the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) views organic farming.
Some years ago, ICCOA proposed a research study to prove the scientific validity of organic agriculture since mainstream scientists were dismissive of this system of growing crops without synthetic fertilisers and chemicals. “Organic agriculture in a holistic sense is sustainable agriculture but ICAR is not ready to accept it,” says Menon.
The project proposal that was put to ICAR’s National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) was to test organic systems in different agro- climatic zones and with different crops (cereals, pulses, spices etc). The outlay was initially Rs 42 crore but it was whittled down to Rs 12 crore. The proposal cleared four committees, including technical, and finally in February 2008 reached the then director general of ICAR Mangala Rai.
“A distinguished scientist Tej Pratap Singh (vice-chancellor, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology) had just started making the presentation. But after just the third slide Rai observed, ‘I do not see any science in organic agriculture’.” That, in fact, sums up the general attitude of mainstream agriculture scientists whose thinking has been shaped by the late Norman Borlaug, father of the Green Revolution, who was a firm believer in the use of synthetic fertilisers to push up crop yields. Borlaug had termed as “ridiculous” the idea that organic farming was better for the environment because it gave lower yields and therefore required more land to produce the same amount of food.
Source: Ministry of Agriculture
Supporters of organic point out that on the contrary the shift from expensive high-input agriculture to knowledge-intensive practices is much kinder to the environment with the emphasis on using naturally available resources (green manure and cowdung), biopesticides, crop rotation and water conservation. But almost everything that the Ministry of Agriculture and ICAR’s vast network of public research institutions does undermines sustainable farming.
Official policies are stuck in what India’s leading authority on biomass, Om P Rupela, terms, “the NPK mindset of mainstream scientists”. NPK stands for chemical elements nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium that are commonly used in fertilisers. “They calculate that the same amount of synthetic NPK that is used in conventional agriculture has to be replaced by an equivalent amount of biomass nitrogen and then claim that India doesn’t have those quantities.”
|
“But the science of biology doesn’t work that way,” says Rupela, former scientist with ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) who conducted a long-term experiment on low cost agriculture. “Organic is a different paradigm. The idea is to nurture soils through micro fauna which is there in large numbers, and macro fauna such as earthworms.” Nature has hundreds such but little research has been done on them.
Fortunately, there are open minds in the agriculture departments of states which, unlike ICAR, see merit in organic farming. At least seven states have sought ICCOA’s help to set up organic farming clusters for specific crops. The package includes capacity building, training on organic cultivation and help with certification and market linkages. An analysis of state agriculture policies by Down To Earth shows that 10 states have clearly defined policies for organic farming. These are Karnataka, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Nagaland and Mizoram. Of these, Uttarakhand (10 mountain districts), Sikkim, Nagaland and Mizoram have declared their intention to go 100 per cent organic.
A K Yadav, director of National Centre of Organic Farming, the Ministry of Agriculture’s nodal agency, says it is difficult to say which of these states has the best organic policy but he zeroes in on Uttarakhand and Sikkim as the best. “As far as taking the movement to the people is concerned, Sikkim is more successful. But if we are looking at market facilitation, networking of farmers and ensuring that farmers get a premium, Uttarakhand is ahead.”
Over 30 certified organic producer groups have come up in Uttarakhand in less than a decade, with farmers producing a range of organic commodities like amaranthus, Basmati rice, finger millet, maize, wheat, turmeric paddy, ginger, soybean, rajma (kidney bean), medicinal and aromatic plants and different types of pulses. More villages are waiting to be certified, all thanks to the dedicated efforts of the Uttarakhand Organic Commodity Board (UOCB).
Binita Shah, senior manager, UOCB, says, “Our strategy is focused on clusters for a particular crop because it helps with group certification which brings down the costs considerably. It also helps to reduce transportation cost which is one of the biggest challenges for farming in hilly areas. The other, of course, is ensuring a market for organic produce.” UOCB was set up by the state in 2003 to encourage organic agriculture, primarily in its hill districts.
A signal success story here comes from Haridwar where sugarcane farmers under the aegis of Bhartiya Kisan Club (BKC) have started an organic sugar manufacturing unit. The club, formed in 2009, has 324 members from the nearby areas. Claimed to be India’s first certified organic sugar mill, it supplies major retailer like Sresta’s 24 Letter and supplies often run short. Kartar Singh, president of the club, says, “Farmers associated with us have around 455.66 ha of land where we grow organic sugarcane. To keep farmers’ interest, we have ensured two things. First, we give farmers Rs 10-20 premium per 100 kg of cane and the other is cash payment on delivery of crop.” This ensures that BKC is never short of raw material.
|
One of the interesting learnings from this pioneering venture is that cost of organic cultivation is much lower than that of the conventional method and that sugar recovery is much higher from cane grown with biopesticides. “This more than offsets the 15-20 per cent drop in sugarcane yields. Besides, buyers give us a premium, too,” says Singh. This season BKC has produced around 900 tonnes of organic sugar but expansion is difficult because subsidised agriculture credit is not available. Commercial banks and NABARD have refused to extend any credit to this sugar mill which has a crushing capacity of 25 tonnes per day, set up entirely with the farmers’ investment.
Uttarakhand is the third largest organic state with over 32,000 ha under organic or under conversion, bringing under this tag over 47,000 farmers. Neighbouring Himachal Pradesh has 48 clusters covering 5,800 farmers but has a much larger area under organic farming at 631,902 ha. In fact, in our view Himachal Pradesh has an arguably better policy. The Department of Agriculture provides assistance of Rs 1,500 per farmer for three years to facilitate documentation, database management, training and capacity building, apart from help with certification, market linkage and value addition. They also get Rs 3,750 per cluster for setting up vermicompost units and so far 376,000 such units have come up in the state.
For wider diffusion, the state has involved local NGOs and KVKs or the agriculture extension service centres to promote organic farming. One example of how well this policy works comes from Khakrola village (population: 1,200) where farmers, again, mostly women, have made the difficult switch to organic cultivation over a three-year period. But their hard work has been repaid. The 150 farmers have actually improved their yield—ICAR, please note—and enhanced the marketability of their grains, fruits and vegetables. And these are really small farmers, each with a holding of 60-100 bighas (1 bigha=2,500 sq m). The Khakrola experiment is part of a Rs 1.5 crore model project initiated in 2003 by the M R Morarka Foundation in tandem with the Himachal Pradesh Agriculture Department.
The critical issue here is finding customers for such hard-won produce. Says Rajashekar Reddy Seelam, managing director of Sresta Bioproducts of Hyderabad, the leading domestic retailer: “Markets must provide the incentive for the switchover to organic, but the difficulty is in getting either regular supplies and for assured amounts.” On the other hand, the comfort is that in two drought years, 2008 and 2011, organic farms performed much better than conventional ones because they were more resilient to climate stress, he points out.

Karnataka, the first state to announce an organic farming policy in 2004, is carrying forward research to strengthen organic farming. Biocentre, a certified 17-ha spread of plantations and nurseries, is developing workable models of organic production systems with medicinal and aromatic plants as one of the components. K Ramakrishnappa, additional director in the horticulture department, who looks after organic agriculture, says that one of the more practical initiatives the state has taken is to set up the Jaivik Krishik Society that clubs 47 farmers’ groups and is the nodal agency to facilitate group certification and marketing. It has also set up a Jaivik Mall that offers ample space for farmers wanting to sell their produce directly to consumers.
Another remarkable experiment that Down To Earth would like to highlight is the non-pesticide management (NPM) initiative of Andhra Pradesh. This has freed an impressive 1.5 million ha and 1.5 million farmers from the tyranny of chemicals through a community managed sustainable agriculture (CMSA) initiative. Interestingly, the initiative was launched by the Andhra Pradesh Ministry of Rural Development and not by the Agriculture Department. The fundamental objective of CMSA is to provide healthy food, healthy crops, healthy soil and a healthy life to farmers by ensuring food security locally.
The CMSA philosophy does not necessarily endorse organic as the ultimate objective although both work towards the similar objective of eliminating chemical inputs. Explains D V Raidu, director, CMSA, “Our mandate is to raise the incomes of small farmers, eliminate poverty and liberate ourselves by unlearning the practices of the past. Organic agriculture, on the other hand, leads to tunnel vision since its driving force is only the premium.”
Raidu’s contention is that organic market dynamics are not in the farmer’s hands—true enough, since there are widespread complaints that retailers and NGOs are ripping off the growers—and, therefore, the focus should be on “sustainable, viable and remunerative agriculture”. He also asks why “if organic is so good, it so minuscule? Besides, the premium is earned only on scarcity of supplies.”
However, CMSA, he hastens to add, is ready to help farmers with certification if they want it. “The choice is the farmer’s. The best part of CMSA is it is a programme that fits all needs.” In fact, the groundwork is done to assist farmers with the Participatory Guarantee System certification, a cost-free way of providing quality assurance. But Raidu takes pride in the following statistics: 124 villages declared pesticides-free, 26 villages deemed organic. Not a bad record at all, although the programme only seeks to cut synthetic fertiliser by half, not bar it.
For the Union government, CMSA offers a silver lining: it is saving Rs 1.2 crore on fertiliser subsidy, while farmers are spared an expense of Rs 1.47 crore by eliminating pesticides and cutting fertiliser use.
Mischa Popoff, an IOIA Advanced Organic Inspector in a book "Is it Organic?" said that the main problem is related to the bodies that approve the logos, for organic or fair trade foods. Its an open secret that the industry is characterised by widespread bribery and shadowy business deals. Farmers and indigenous people are being lied to, promised the earth and stolen from.
This report in Down To earth confirms what we all know. The premium attached to organic food is not for the masses but for the small affluent pockets within the country and export economies who already have agriculture surpluses.
http://devconsultancygroup.blogspot.in/2012/05/organic-agriculture-suffe...
Rajan Alexander
Mischa Popoff writes about the US organic industry and what he says about the fraudulent practices there seems credible because there are numerous other reports that claim much of what is passed off as organic in America is not really so. In India, on the other hand, we have more organic food produced in the country than is certified (see chart Are we losing the value of organic production? in the second story States opt for the green way ).
Popoff also appears to be strongly biased against organic. Reacting to a recent paper published in Nature where researchers had used comprehensive meta-analysis to examine the relative yield performance of organic and conventional crops and shown that the yield differences are contextual, Popoff rubbishes the study and says that “I will continue to believe what I saw with my own eyes.” Really? How does anyone measure yields with eyes? And across the world?
He claims that yields in organics are just half of what conventional farmers get but does not care to tell us how he arrived at this figure. The claim also makes it puzzling to explain why increasing numbers of farmers are turning organic in the US.
As for organic food being elitist that’s true at the moment, Rajan. The transition to organic production is a costly process for the farmer and he needs to be recompensed. However, prices are high now is because of market economics: growing demand and limited supply. But let’s look ahead. What if the movement against chemical pesticides and fertilisers gains ground as in Andhra Pradesh and millions of farmers turn to organic farming?
Posted by
Latha Jishnu
Dear Latha:
What I saw with my own eyes were the harvest records of honest organic farmers. That's what inspectors like me do.
And from this first-hand experience I can report that organic yields are about half what conventional yields are, which is fine because organic farming is NOT about quantity, rather, it's about quality.
Why do you say I'm strongly biased against organic? I support organics. Always have, always will. I grew up on an organic farm.
What I'm dead-set opposed to is fraud and gross negligence, along with any phony marketing campaigns that mislead the public about ANY foods, including but certainly not limited to organic foods.
Mischa Popoff
Dear Mischa,
I am really delighted to hear from you. I agree entirely with you that yields should not be the main criterion for measuring the success of organic agriculture – it is, indeed, about quality, not quantity. And yet, I would like to point out that several organic farmers’ groups across India have achieved yields that are comparable with conventional methods of farming which rely on a basket of chemical inputs and synthetic fertilizer. This is particularly true of rain-fed areas where farmers have customarily jettisoned chemical additives because a) they could not afford these and b) it was a waste of money since without irrigation no amount of pesticide and fertilizer inputs helped in situations where the soils are badly degraded. In times of severe weather stress, organic farmers have fared much better and we can provide examples of this. I have not come across any case of suicide by an organic farmer (we have a deplorably high rate of suicides by farmers in India).
I am also delighted that you are a champion of organic farming and am sorry that I misconstrued what you said in response to the study of Verena Seufert, Navin Ramankutty and Jonathan Foley (published in Nature ) as being antagonistic to this method of cultivation. I wish that you could come to India to take the veil off the organized fraud in organic certification. It would certainly help the nascent organic movement here.
Posted by
Latha Jishnu
The sustainable agriculture story must be written about constantly like this piece in DTE. These "good" stories are essential so all of us realise that we can make a change as consumers and producers. However, while cities and towns are seeing a spurt in restaurants and organic shops the livelihood story of small and marginal farmers is still bleak. From personal experience working with small and marginal farmers to promote agroecological practices in farming, it is evident that (i) there is no market incentive for small farmers located far away from cities and towns to move towards sustainable farming (ii) even those who are located proximal to towns and cities are not able to access supply channels to the organic stores (iii) small farmers, unless they are organised into collectives by NGOs, do not have the resources to leave their farms and convey their produce to markets. If the "organic revolution" or rather the "sustainable farming" revolution is to really make a difference to the livelihood of the small producer and therefore the land and water resources, significant State support in the form of support for inputs (seed, labour, microirrigation, storage areas etc.) and of course well organised market links must be provided. Otherwise, I am afraid it will remain yet another example of environmental elitism which is increasingly emerging as the the new "caste system".
Radha
Finally, a decent article chronicling the organic movement in India. The same trouble faced by small organic farmers here in California is true with small farmers in India- certification cost. Fortunately, with decades of persistence, the organic farmer in California is happier today. Farmers market penetration into urban landscapes was part of the huge shift. As more of them sold their produce directly to the consumers, they gained as the big box retailers gave then pennies on the dollar for their produce. Best wishes to all in the organic movement in India.
meenakshi srinivasan
Good article.
In this context I would like to put some hard facts -- In my view point the two greatest criminals of India, Shri. C. Subramayam the then Central Agriculture Minister and Dr. M. S. Swaminathan the then chief of agriculture were responsible for the present day Indian farmers’ miseries.
They looked at short term increase in food production with hidden agenda of long term grains to Western MNCs as this technology was tailored to highly subsidize chemical inputs. Like a coin which has tail and head, any technology has both positive and negative aspects. In the adaptation of green revolution technology to India these two looked at positive side – increasing the food production to meet the immediate needs – but over looked at the long term consequences of this technology – negative side – on environment and humans.
This technology destroyed the environment and human health beyond restoration. This technology destroyed bio-diversity and thus traditional agriculture, which was environment friendly and provide good and healthy food. The green revolution technology is non-environment friendly and bad and unhealthy food. Fortunately, African’s kept this technology away while Asians who sub-serve the West adapted this.
The traditional agriculture technology was a soil and weather driven with animal husbandry forming a major component; while green revolution technology is irrigation and industry driven --chemical inputs & seed. The former benefits the farming community while the later benefits the business community. To improve the economy of farming community, we must reverse our agriculture system and adapt traditional agriculture system that in fact reduces drastically the wasteful expenditure running in to lakhs of crores each year by governments in terms of subsidy and loans that can be better utilized in the building up of rural infrastructure in terms of storage facilities, education, health care, roads/transport, food processing, etc.
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
This four page writeup was simply awesome. Can this be transalated in Tamil?
Giri
Giri Kumar
Your cover story "Organic Boom" has surpassed my expectations with such wonderful articles. Your wonderful reportage does two things in one go: encourages us ...and helps us grow, organically.
I would like to bring in some more examples of people who are working for organic. They are Sachin Desai, who is promoting organic agriculture and PGS with Nai Talim through his organization, Syamantak- School Without Walls. www.syamantak.org; Ms. Smita Shirodkar, a management professional whose father owns and runs the Murphy electronics producing company. She is promoting organics among the urban Mumbai dwellers.There are plenty of others doing their work happily and silently, like Dr. Sultan Ismail at New College, Chennai; Jayant Barve in Vita-Sangli; Dr. Bharatendu Prakash in Chhatarpur, Bundelkhand [M.P./U.P border], Vikram Rawat in Himachal Pradesh, Anita & Kalyan Paul in Ranikhet; Joy Daniel in Bidkin-Aurangabad; Mary & Bablu Ganguli in Anantpur, Andhra Pradesh; Dr PV Satheesh in Medak, Andhra Pradesh; Mathew John in Kotagiri-Nilgiris; Rony Joseph in Kottayam-Kerala; Dr N Devakumar at the University of Agricultural Science, Bengaluru and plenty of others.
I would like to clarify that I am still a part of OFAI and member of the PGS Organic Council through the Botanical Society of Goa. However, I left the position of "Additional Director" at OFAI Central Secretariat and resigned as Secretary of PGS Organic Concil for the sake of the organizations. Thank you and may your tribe increase and populate the Earth, naturally.
Miguel A Braganza
Great article Latha & Jyotika, something like this was needed to understand the whole organic food picture of India.
Hope this helps many more people who are part of the hidden organic world ( who sell their organic produce in local markets without any differentiation due to lack of access and logistical and other difficulties) to get access to markets and consumers.
Devi
Organic Boom is an introspection on how Organic Agriculture works in India. India's premier institute ICAR has not done any research for promoting organic agriculture and its attitude too seems to be disgusting. The incident described in the story on how ICAR snubs organic is an irony as agriculture is not about technology only.
The authors Latha and Jyotika have done a good job. It would be now more intresting to read on various Organic systems prevalent in different areas of the country which still have to tab market potential. Eg: in my state Meghalaya, largely agriculture is organic but the produce is sold normally in the market.
I would request the authors to do bringin North East India also in picture as the region is still unexplored.
Anna
Very informative article. However I have few questions which would help understand the organic opportunity and the growth potential in India as we stand today..
What would be the total size of the domestic organic foods market in India?
Also what would be the share of major players like Morarka(only foods), 24 Letter Mantra in the total pie? What is the distribution model followed by these companies for placement of their products at various retail chains. Does it follow the same model as FMCG companies with a chain of distributors, CNFs, dealers, retailers etc or is it much leaner?
Saurabh
There's no choice but for Organic to grow... we can't just sit around an complain when we read another report on how many chemicals there are in our food or how adulterated our milk is. As consumers we need to raise the alarm and raise the demand for healthy and safe food.
www.esvasa.com works in that direction ... making our readers aware about the what why and wherefore of organic food. Let's hope the organic community supports eachother to increase awareness and health!
Vandana
Hello Latha Mam,
I am a student of International hospitality and tourism in London (U.K.). I am going through a research topic "The Sustainability of Organic Food in Luxury Hotels and Their Supply Chain Management Practices. (India)".
Mam, Your research and content have helped me a lot to make and collect data for my research. Thanks a lot for you concern towards ecological and green environment for sustainability. Mam i have some questions in my mind for my research. can i have your precious time and email you for one or two question please.It will help me a lot in my research.
Kind regard,
sunny chari.
Sunny Chari
Excellent article on Organic Universe in general and Food in particular.
A 2011 survey by the Organic Trade Association found that more than threequarters—78 percent—of U.S. families are buying organic food, up from 73 percent in 2009. Forty percent of families say they are buying more organic food now than they were a year ago.
In 2010, the U.S. organic food and beverage industry grew at a rate of 7.7 percent, posting total sales of $26.7 billion. In comparison, growth in total U.S. food sales stagnated at 0.6 percent. Organic food accounted for four percent of the $673 billion food industry in 2010.
Since 2000, the U.S. organic food industry has grown exponentially. In 2000, organic food sales totaled $6.1 billion and represented a mere 1.2 percent of total food sales. From 2000 to 2010, the organic food industry grew at an average rate of 16.5 percent per year, compared to 3.25 percent average annual growth in the overall food industry.Organic food sales in the U.S. comprise nearly half of global organic food sales.
The global organic market reached $54.9 billion in 2009, more than triple the $18 billion recorded in 2000.In Turkey also interest on Organic Foods is on the increase:
“After scandalous news articles about food, people now have more faith in organic products,” said Demirci, while Sümerli -- who is also the chairman of the Istanbul-based Organic Product Producers and Industrialists Association -- maintained that the consumer identifies organic foods more and more with health. He quotes the consumers: “Yes, organic foods are a little expensive, but we think we do the right thing by spending on food some of the money which we would spend on health in later years.” What Uygun Aksoy, professor at Ege University ‘s faculty of agriculture, told Sunday’s Zaman in connection to this is quite revealing. “Should people have major concerns regarding food safety, then organic foods are perceived primarily as healthy foods,” she said, confirming that it’s food safety that is at the top of the agenda in Turkey. But in countries such as Norway, Sweden and Denmark, where food safety is already of a high standard, most people buy organic products to help protect the environment. In big cities, the number of people shopping at organic markets, which are open once a week and where the prices of most vegetables and fruits are only about 20 percent higher than that of the conventional foods, has also increased. Leyla Ünlübay, project coordinator for ecological marketplaces at the İstanbul-based Buğday Association, told Sunday’s Zaman that the number of visitors has increased by 10 to 15 percent in recent months. Like many other people from the organic sector, she also believes this is an indicator of people’s increasing awareness about the food they consume.
People’s preference for organic foods is not without merit. In terms of nutrition, apart from being free of chemicals, organic foods have a clear edge over conventional products. Milk contains both omega-3 and omega 6 fatty acids; however, while omega 3 is known to protect blood vessels, omega 6 has a blocking role. “In the milk of livestock which feed on grass out in the fields, omega 3 is the dominant element in the fatty acid balance, whereas the opposite is true for livestock kept in industrial farms. So, the fat you get from industrially produced milk has a negative quality to it,” Mustafa Kaymakçı, another professor at Ege University’s faculty of agriculture, told Sunday’s Zaman.”(Interest in organic products considerably increases after scandalous food stories, Today’s Zaman, 13 May 2012 / AYDIN ALBAYRAK, ANKARA).
Here is interesting facts on Organic Vs normal foods:
Answer 1: Nope. A meta study published three years ago in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (July 29, 2009) and discussed in a previous Science 2.0 article arrived at the same conclusion
Question 2: Which type of food is free of organic pesticide residue? Which has levels below permissible levels?
Answer 2: According to the same Stanford group which examined 223 studies involving either pesticides or nutrients, 62% of conventionally grown food and 93% of organically grown fruits and vegetables had no pesticide residues. In almost all cases the levels of pesticides were below permissible levels.
Question 3: Which meats, organic or conventional, are less likely to be contaminated by harmfulE. coli bacteria?
Answer: Neither. The common culprits, regardless of farming methods, were chicken and pork.
Question 4: For organic meat, is there less a possibility that it will be contaminated by at least 3 bacteria types that are resistant to antibiotics?
Answer 4: Yes, 33% less likely, but there are probably no clinical consequences to this, according to the authors.
Question 5: Did the authors find any long term studies of the health benefits of eating organic versus conventionally grown food?
Answer 5: Nope! In the last fourteen years, organic food in the United States has grown from a $3.7 billion to a $24.4 billion business. But the growth has been based on a combination of misinformation (with regard to nutritional content) and a mixture of fear and possibly over cautionary principles (organic food, overall, does have less pesticide residue, but we don't know if the small amounts are actually harmful.),[ Another Meta Study on Organic Foods By Enrico Uva | September 3rd 2012,Science2.0 Join the Revolution].
In India Organic Farming has long history. Here are some Examples:
ORAGANIC AGRICULTURE, please visit this website.http://www.savesanghavi.com/ There are Two persons Mr. Save and Mr. Sanghavi are actively in same business for last 20-25 years, and from Gujarat (Umbergaon –near navsari). They have made almost 7-8 farms after success in 1 farm. You can visit the site and find out more how they did that, they have mentioned everything. They have written one book also in gujarati and English for our farmers based on their experiences and techniques, I request you all to buy that and give it to your village relatives who are active in agriculture business.
*I would like to quote one instance from the book………They give the weed (Nindaman) from their farm to one dairyman who has some 20-25 cows & buffalos, this continue to almost 4-5 years and one day they changed their mind and refuse the dairyman to give weed from farm. Surprisingly that dairyman asked them to pay any buck for that weed as his cows and buffalos after eating that weeds for years never got ill and become 2-3 times more productive
There are some known myths about organic farming,which are unfounded:1) Myth: Production will be less in organic farming:
Actual: It is totally depend on which techniques you have used, and if production is less in first phase any reason, it will be definitely increased in next lot. We need to also change accordingly and implement the same with experienced person. Here one have to also look at the point that we are getting high quality, at less price; so don’t hope for bumper production in first phase, later on it will be there for sure.
2) Myth: Organic products are very costly in market
Actual: Actually in organic farming the production cost is very much low compared to current ones, but some business minded people in the name of quality make it higher price. We can sell our products at much lower rates ( I have plans to do the same in future).
3) Myth: It uses worms, I don’t like that.
Actual: There are many more optional methods available in organic farming, like cow dung, cow urine, cow ghee, need etc OR you can use save-sanghavi method.
4) I don’t know much about organic farming:
Actual: You can contact near Krishi Kendra or best thing is to visit any of four available Krishi Universities in Gujarat. They will give you all the details. You can also search on internet, there are so many groups, websites, articles which will clear your doubts.
5) There is no big market for Organic Products:
Actual: There is much big market of organic products nationally and internationally, we need to explore little bit more. You can not only focus on organic farming but also on organic horticulture, organic herbal products, you can also use some by products. Main thing is that there is already market available and if it is not there we can create the market, people will surely come for organic as it not use any pesticide and chemical fertilizer.
Now you will definitely ask, if it is so much useful, high yields, high returns…………….why it is not much popular? So to answer this question let us first make some points clear.
Organic farming is our ancient method, there is no question of something totally new, we just forget the same. It is because of some vested interest of some MNC companies, chemical fertiliser companies and bureaucrats they don’t want this thing to happen or known by everyone. There are number of examples where people got really benefited from organic farming.
There is so much information available on internet regarding how organic farming alone can solve India’s food problem, also some technical docs which shows how to make panchjanyamrut which may replace pesticides and fertiliser. You won’t believe there is cow dung, cow urine trading going on the net.( Organic Agriculture in Detail-The right and ancient way of Agriculture , Himanshu Acharya,DEshGujarat, 7 December, 2009).
In India traditionally natural pesticides were used by our Farmers in the past like neem oil,Tobacco,Tinospora Cardifoila Creeper. Also Annona Squamosa(Custard Apple) seed oil is toxic.
There is the need to revive Organic Farming to reduce pollution and to retain natural fertility of the soil.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: Anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Dr.A.Jagadeesh
Post new comment