icrn phw energy cse dte gobar times rwh csestore iep aaeti
Reviews

Politics of irrigation

2 Comments
Apr 15, 2013 | From the print edition

Book>> Controlling The Water: Matching Technology And Institutions In Irrigation Management In India And Nepal • Edited By Dick Roth And Linden Vincent • Oxford University Press, New Delhi • Rs. 995

reviewMost irrigation bureaucracies believe problems of farmers end once water is delivered on to a block of land. Irrigation is an essential component of agriculture but it is not neutral. More often than not it reaches rich farmers. This can affect poor farmers unless there is concerted social action to counter the effect. Introducing farmer managed irrigation systems (FMIS), too, has not helped.

This has been amply elaborated in Controlling the Water: Matching Technology and Institutions in Irrigation Management in India and Nepal, spread over 12 chapters by different authors.

bookThrough Warabandi and Shejpally irrigation systems practised in some villages of Haryana and Maharashtra, Vishal Narayan brings out the problems of allocation of canal water, its rotation, rationing, distribution, pricing, lending as well as policy gaps.

Bala Raju Nikku discusses why the “big bang” approach of irrigation adopted by Andhra Pradesh in the last decade failed. The system assumed that mismanagement of irrigation could be addressed by shrinking the irrigation bureaucracy, increasing water charges and transferring maintenance of infrastructure and water distribution to elected water users’ associations (WUAs). But WUA leaders were hesitant to take over the role and engineers did not want to lose control over distribution.

Irrigation schemes were also transferred to WUAs in Nepal to improve the performanceof official agencies. Pushpa Raj Khanal narrates how the traditional background of farmers at Panchakanya and Khageri irrigation schemes in Chit awan district and their ability to sort out differences led to better performance of WUAs, while the WUA of Nepal West Gandak Irrigation Scheme in Nawalparasi lost its acceptability due to corruption and inability to resolve conflicts.

Umesh Nath Parajuli calls for attention to three FMIS near the foot hills of Nepal. Farmers there divert streams to fields with the help of weirs with adjust able width notches and define water share according to their labour input in constructing the structure.

Suman Rimal Gautam highlights how farmers in Nepal’s Rupandehi district have resorted to conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water after they faced water scarcity following installation of deep tube wells between 1975 and 1999.

Dug wells started drying up in Sangpura village in Gujarat’s Mehsana district in the 1960s, following which rich farmers switched to deep tube wells. Anjal Prakash discusses how this choice of technology weighed heavily in favour of big farmers and poor farmers suffered.

Esha Shah and R Manimohan talk about the much glorified tank irrigation system in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. It employed labourers who were kept in perpetual servitude. Mining and deforestation in Tamil Nadu led to soil erosion and sedimentation of tanks, causing more problems for the labourers.

Jyothi Krishnan discusses the dwindling of traditional irrigation system in Kerala’s Palakkad district. Groundwater exploitation has led to unsustainable and inequitable water use patterns, affecting property rights over land and water in the region.

The chapter by Ameeta Regmi and Linden Vincent focuses on two micro-hydel schemes in Nepal’s Khabre Palanchowk district. While traditional social fabric and influence of the elders led to a better functioning of one, the other one failed due to weak organisational setup.

At the end, Peter Mollinga concludes that intellectual and institutional odds are still largely against practising science. He offers suggestions for further research.

Land, water and labour are the three components of agriculture. Control over the first two by landlords always keeps the labourer or the sharecroppers on their toes. To safeguard the interests of the labourer, the essays demand policy tilt in their favour.

The many ideas it presents makes the book an interesting read. A chapter on irrigation on the Indian side of the border with Nepal would have added to its value. 

Dinesh Kumar Mishra is convenor of Barh Mukti Abhiyan, a Bihar-based NGO
 

 

AddThis

Congratulations to the author to bring out such important study. It is the need of the hour to understand the SWOT of Agriculture. It is beyond doubt that WATER plays a significant role in shaping the development of the nation with better sustainability and quality. Even the move towards the creation FOOD SECURITY needs to support Agriculture / Farmers to get the maximum production with due weightage to the health & wealth of the environment.

In addition to the three components listed as Land, Water & Labour, Agriculture / Farmers need many other supports which are lacking at present and thus resulted for low production and further lowered the quality of life of the Farmers.

The other supports the Farmers or Agriculture requires includes:

1. Inputs like seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, etc.,
2. Priority for organic farming,
3. Financial support including the linkages with the banks and other financial institutes,
4. Technical guidance for better production,
5. Suitable facilities for storage,
6. Facilitation for marketing including cooperatives, and
7. Other supports from time to time.

Certainly, such measures improves the agri production in terms of both quantity and quality and further to move towards better FOOD SECURITY.

8 April 2013
Posted by
Lakshmi Narayana Nagisetty

I like your response.

Have a suggestion to add in items listed as support stress on organic and natural forms to curb the rise and expansion of artificial means to address issues.
1. Inputs like organic seeds, organic fertilizers, natural pesticides or natural pest control methods, etc.,

also add as required support
Techniques to help farmers with mixed crop farming.

Food Security needs to stress on enabling local populations build maintain and sustain local food security measures where they are not forced to buy genetically modified seeds; where local bodies organize and retain local seeds from their own crops for the sowing of their next crops.

Even Nutrition Security is being misused by the private and the development sector to promote synthetic micro nutrients through fortification or administered through drops or tablets instead of ensuring and encouraging the consumption of nutrient rich local seasonal foods. With the way things are being forced on countries through aided programs the next generations will be popping a bunch of pills for their daily nutrition instead of getting it from wholesome foods.

12 April 2013
Posted by
Nirmala Selvam

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


(Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.)
CSE WEBNET
Follow us ON
Follow grebbo on Twitter    Google Plus  DTE Youtube  rss