icrn phw energy cse dte gobar times rwh csestore iep aaeti
Reporter's Diary

Roadmap for an effective environmental regime

3 Comments
Mar 29, 2013 | From the print edition

Nivit Kumar Yadav reports on how different countries are tackling environmental pollution and the lessons in it for India

A two-day conference on environmental compliance and enforcement that concluded recently in Kolkata gave me a rare chance to listen to environmental regulators from around the world—the US, Sweden, Kenya, Australia and Norway. 

The choice of the city for the international conference seemed very appropriate. B K Dutta, chairperson of West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB), who welcomed the delegates, informed that Kolkata was the first city ever to have an environmental law—the Smoke Nuisance law—as far back as in 1906. 

Non-compliance: serious problem in the US, too

One of the major problems faced by Indian State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) is non-compliance of statutory norms by industries, whether large, small or medium. I was surprised when I heard that the situation is pretty much the same in the US. “Two-thirds of corporate counsels admit that their companies have violated the environmental laws in the recent past in the US. It is just not possible to achieve full compliance,” said Robert Percival from University of Maryland. In order to strengthen the compliance percentage, the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has taken a number of steps, such as adopting a whistle blower policy wherein workers can report non-compliance, and they are protected under law. 

SPCBs in India have taken some initiatives to improve compliance by industries. The pollution control board of West Bengal, for instance, has started “an Environment Compliance Assistance Centre with an objective of assisting small and medium scale industries meet national and international regulatory requirements and going beyond the voluntary measures,” said Dutta. But all SPCBs have a long way to go before they can achieve better compliance. To begin with, their documentation is poor. 

USEPA also maintains a website where the list of wanted environmental criminals are posted . Compliance history of industry is published by USEPA which can be accessed by everyone. Even regional level industry compliance history is available. Indian regulators could take a cue from the US on this. As of now, there is no such database available in our country.

Like USEPA, the Victoria Environmental Protection Agency also prepares an annual compliance plan, elaborating what they will focus on and what they will check during inspection. This document is available online and can be accessed by public. The other innovative step by EPA Victoria is training officers who are involved with compliance and enforcement. The authorised officers are trained on regulatory aspects, inter-personal skills and technical details before they are sent for inspection and monitoring. 

Training and protocol for inspection is something which is missing in India. Some SPCBs, such as the Maharasthra Pollution Control Board, do appoint field officers for inspection and monitoring. But these officers are from diverse educational backgrounds and no inspection protocol or training provided to them.  

The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) has adopted a self-monitoring programme where industry has to develop self-monitoring programme in consultation with SEPA. The industry is obliged to report to SEPA immediately if there is any deviation from monitoring programme or statutory norms. Penalties are imposed if violation is not reported by industry. 

Framing environmental objectives

In India, the functions of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and SPCBs are well defined in the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981. But there is no time frame under which the regulators have to complete certain tasks. The result is more severe deterioration of quality of water (surface or ground) and air quality since the formation of CPCB and SPCBs. 

Developed countries have gone a step ahead in this regard. Besides the functions defined in their law, they have also set up environmental objectives for subsequent five years and annual action plans for regulatory bodies are finalised in keeping with the environmental objectives. “The job of SEPA revolves around environmental objectives set by the ministry of environment of Sweden which provides a clear roadmap to SEPA and its subordinate offices to undertake activities in a set time frame for fulfilling the objective set by ministry,” said Ylva Reinhard, programme coordinator  with SEPA. 

How frequent should be inspections?

Another important topic discussed during the conference was frequency of inspection of industries. In India, CPCB has issued guidelines for inspection and monitoring of industries based on their pollution potential. “Because of manpower shortage, we are never able to meet the guidelines proposed by CPCB,” admitted D K Behera, senior environmental scientist with Odisha State Pollution Control Board, who appeared to ruffle the feathers of other government officials by his candid observations on Indian SPCBs. 

Norway has adopted risk-based approach for effective enforcement of environmental laws in the country.  “The inspection frequency in Norway is based upon risk factor of industry—higher the risk factor, higher the frequency of inspection. Another criterion to decide inspection frequency is compliance history of the industry. In case an industry has bad compliance history, the frequency of inspection is higher compared to an industry with good compliance history,” said Anne Marie Mo Ravik, senior advisor, Klif, the Climate and Pollution Control Agency under Norway's environment ministry. 

What ails Indian SPCBs 

Behera, during his tell-all talk, highlighted the inherent grey areas in SPCBs: inadequate technical manpower; few technical members as compared to non-technical members; absence of criteria to calculate the minimum staff required by a board. What’s more, most SPCBs do not have full-time chairperson which hampers decision-making. On the other hand, there has been exponential increase in number of industries and environmental regulations. “That is why environmental monitoring has taken a back seat,” said Behera. 

Many speakers in the conference referred to the WBPCB as the best SPCB in the country. WBPCB could, therefore, set a benchmark by ushering in changes in the wake of lessons learnt from the conference. 

AddThis

Gr8........................

Wish if it is followed in our Country...........

Chandigarh & Mohali are the only smoke free cities in India...............You don't have a Paan-Cigarette shop there.

1 April 2013
Posted by
Raizada YVS

If someone says that "it is just not possible to achieve full compliance" (Ref: Road map for an effective environmental regime, DTE) in respect of pollution caused by the industries, then the basic question arises about the Act itself. It it is true that ECONOMIC GROWTH is essential, and when it is not balances with SOCIAL & ECONOMIC concerns, then it loses its basic purpose. When you know that environmental compliance is a MUST, in view of GLOBAL WARMING which is going to destroy everything on this GLOBE, then everyone will feel and do the needful. As long as pollution is not pinching or not affecting you, then things will be different and will pass the issue to other weaker or vulnerable groups.

Some of the grey areas indicated in the conference which include: inadequate technical manpower; few technical members as compared to non-technical members; absence of criteria to calculate the minimum staff required by a board. What’s more, decision-making, exponential increase in number of industries and environmental regulations. The statement “That is why environmental monitoring has taken a back seat,” indicates the nature of moving away from the problem.

In spite of all these limitations, still several opportunities exists for better compliance of pollution for the health & wealth of the people & environment. In only needs concern and commitment of the right people at the right chair.

10 April 2013
Posted by
Lakshmi Narayana Nagisetty

Dear Nivit sir,

Indeed practices like availability of online information on compliance history of company and too many non-compliance of standards wrt parameters can trigger series of inspections seems like a practice that can be given serious thought by our Ministry. Since the linkage provides onus to industries to perform well on environment front too.

Thanks so much for sharing the global practices prevailing for ensuring compliance. I hope the meet in Kolkatta went well.

My best wishes!
Thanks
Ishikaa

28 August 2013
Posted by
Ishikaa

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


(Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.)
CSE WEBNET
Follow us ON
Follow grebbo on Twitter    Google Plus  DTE Youtube  rss