icrn phw energy cse dte gobar times rwh csestore iep aaeti

Second disempowerment

0 Comments
Posted on: 15 Jun, 2013

imageTribals have lost their decision-making power twice; first to the state then to the Maoists

India has developed a fatal attraction for tribal areas. A gruesome event is usually what gets the country to talk about tribals. Maoist insurgents, the most talked about contemporary residents of India’s forests, apart from tigers, ambushed a convoy of Congress leaders, wiping out Chhattisgarh’s top rank leadership. Mahendra Karma, known more as the founder of the illegal and brutal anti-Maoist peace movement Salwa Judum, died in the attack. Attention poured over the dense forests of Bastar. The tribal residents have seen this earlier many a time. The debate over development of tribal areas rages in digital spaces far from their imagination. Outside their desperate lives they remain the invisible objects of debates and discussions that unfold to die a natural death until the next such incident occurs.

These spells of attention have harmed tribal concerns for the simple reason that the debates are highly polarised and revolve around ideology than ideas of development. Such debates have shifted the strategic decision-making power from the community to groups, both government and non-government, that assume mandate on their behalf. This is an antithesis of constitutional recognition of tribal right to self-governance. Solidarity has almost turned into subversion.

Contemporary debates over tribals usually end up with a state-versus-Maoist fight. The government’s argument that Maoists hinder development hardly has a rationale as its own policies and programmes invariably lead to alienation of tribals from their resources. On the other hand, the argument of non-government groups that alienation creates space for Maoists does not exactly lead to tribal development. It only perpetuates the action-reaction mode of events, while pushing real concerns of tribal regions into oblivion. Rather it has legitimised Maoists as the champions of tribals. There is no visible evidence to show that tribal communities have conferred on Maoists such a privilege.

The end result is that any development in India’s tribal areas is seen as a contest between two powers—the state and the Maoists. Tribals are just the right instrument. For all functional purposes, these debates do not bear any meaning for either the tribal population or their development. This is because the tribals, or their opinions, hardly feature in either of the warring faction’s agenda. In a way, this is the second disempowerment of the tribals—first the state resumed mandate on their behalf, and now the Maoists have done so. Both the sides overtly fight for power. In an ideal tribal council, local communities would have excommunicated both the players.

There are many Maoist-infested areas where local communities are in agreement with government programmes. But they do not support the government because Maoists are sure to hound them. For example, Maoists oppose construction of roads for strategic reasons. Many forest villages need roads for faster access to health centres and to local markets for their produce. These are everyday needs that cannot be postponed till the elusive revolution. In Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh there are villages where roads were sanctioned a decade ago but work has not started. Its impacts are diametrically opposed to the tenets of the Maoists. Minor forest traders now come to the village, pick up tribals’ produce at cheap rates, and sell them in nearby market at high profit. It is a matter of another revolution that Maoists collect “taxes” from the traders in the very market. The longer the road construction faces local resistance, the more is the police brutality on people suspected to be Maoist sympathisers.

This blurs the difference between a gun-toting policeperson and a Maoist in the eyes of a tribal. But the debate raging outside conveniently ignores this. One is either with the government or with the Maoists. Maoists’ killing Karma does not reduce the risk of state unleashing another bout of violence in tribal areas. Reports suggest some 10,000 security people are entering the Bastar forests to flush out Maoists. Similarly, by showing a high rate of Maoist casualties in an operation, government cannot ensure there will be a feeling of less alienation among tribals.

A few months ago, tribal rights activist and former bureaucrat B D Sharma said in an interview to Down To Earth that tribals’ alienation did not start with Maoists so it will not end with their defeat. In fact, the tug of war has continued for so long that it sounds clichéd now to talk about development as an antidote to Maoists. The need of the hour is to allow tribal communities what they cherish most—self-governance. This does not mean absence of government but less of it with more power to tribals to govern. There are many villages in Maoist areas which have resisted both the government and the Maoists to regain control over local affairs. They need to be celebrated.

AddThis

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


(Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.)

Sign in to post

More Blog Posts by Richard Mahapatra

Contributors

Rationalist and president of the Federation of Rationalists Association of India
Bidyut Mohanty is founder and secretary of SPREAD, based in Koraput
Researcher with the Nature Conservation Foundation
Affiliation: Fellow, Rights and Resources Initiative
Independent researcher
Research Associate, Industry & Environment (CSE)
Phd candidate, UC Berkeley’s College of Environmental Design
Senior Programme Manager, Regional Centre for Development Cooperation
Director Programmes, Keystone Foundation
RBI Chair Professor of Economics
Sustainable Finance Project Officer
Assistant Professor, TISS, Mummbai
National Institute of Malaria Research, Guwahati
Director of Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhi Nagar
Manager of Médecins Sans Frontières's Access Campaign in India
Gujarat-based environment activist
Consultant, CSE
Independent researcher working on poverty, public public policy and governance
Researcher with the Centre for Equity Studies in New Delhi
South Asia Program Director at International Rivers
Policy Director at International Rivers
Independent Weather Forecaster, METD WEATHER
National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians and former UN water expert
Project Officer, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Programme Director, CSE
works with Shola Trust, a non-profit involved in nature conservation in the Nilgiri region of South India
Trustee, Save Animals Initiative Sanctuary Trust, Karnataka
Vice-president
Activist and researcher
Activist and researcher
Programme director (HealthBridge Foundation of Canada)
Programme Director, CSE
Professor, NIUA
Earth system scientist
Consultant, Social Sector
Researcher
Journalist
Food and nutrition consultant
Assistant Professor, IG Medical College, Shimla
Programme manager, Food Safety and Toxins, CSE
Associate Professor of Environmental Sociology at the University of Wisconsin at Eau Claire, USA
Visiting professor of economics at Mount Holyoke College, USA
Former Deputy Director at the National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad
Works with indigenous groups in the Nilgiris and writes about dalits and other marginalised communities
Convenor and Head of Jiye Yamuna Abhiyan
Managing Trustee, Wildlife First
Fellow and Convenor, Centre for Environment and Development Studies
Associate Professor, Ambedkar University
Shuba V Raghavan is an independent energy policy analyst
Professor and Dean, Faculty of Planning, CEPT University
Senior reporter, Down To Earth
Reporter, Down To Earth
Research Associate, CSE
Co-director, Anthra
Director, Research Centre for Internet and Society
Programme Officer, Right to Clean Air Campaign (CSE)
Research Associate, Green Rating Project (CSE)
Conservation ecologist
Conservation ecologist
Research Associate
Heads the Division of Policy Planning, and Training & Capacity Development at India's National Institute of Disaster Management at IIPA campus in New Delhi
DG, Amity Institute for Herbal and Biotech Products Development
Associate Global Co-ordinator of the Peoples Health
Senior Fellow with SOPPECOM, Pune
Principal Scientist with NISTADS, New Delhi
Co-founder, Nature Conservation Foundation
Assistant Professor, IISc
Science communicator with Vigyan Prasar, New Delhi
Chief Copy Editor, Down To Earth
Reporter, Down To Earth
Programme Director, CSE
Wildlife biologist
Senior Editor, Down To Earth
Deputy Programme Manager, CSE
News Editor, Down To Earth
Science Editor, Down To Earth
Senior Editor, Down To Earth
Secretary with Vikas Samvad Human Development and Food Rights Resource Center
Deputy Director General, CSE
Features Editor, Down To Earth
Editor, Down To Earth
CSE WEBNET
Follow us ON
Follow grebbo on Twitter    Google Plus  DTE Youtube  rss