
I am a regular reader of DTE, and I take all your reports very seriously as an environment professionla myself. But sadly i...
Keeping in purview the problems and difficulties faced by the daily commuters form Meerut and adjoining area to Noida and...
Mumbai development authority shows no sign of relenting; invites bids
The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority has locked horns with environmentalists as it prepares to execute its ambitious bridge project—the Mumbai Trans Harbour Link (MTHL). The 22km road corridor, to be constructed at an estimated cost of Rs 8,800 crore, will connect Mumbai and Nhava Sheva in Navi Mumbai. Environmentalists are demanding a change in the route alignment, saying it will destroy an important flamingo habitat, mudflats and mangroves.
“We are not against development. But at the same time, we want to protect the environment which is threatened by MTHL,” says Asad R Rahmani, director of non-profit, Bombay Natural History Society. BNHS is opposing the positioning of MTHL at Sewree, the starting point of the link (see map).
.jpg)
In a letter to chief engineer of MMRDA S M Sabnis on November 10, BNHS has asked the authority to shift the starting point of the MTHL around 700 metre south of its current position. “This will help saving the mudflats and flamingos. This will achieve the goal of saving the mangroves for conservation and development together,” says Rahmani while adding that birds and bridge can coexist if given a chance.
It’s a potential Ramsar site
“The entire population of flamingos will vanish if the link is constructed from its current location as it will pass right through the mudflats where thousands of flamingos come to feed every year,” says Rahmani.
There are around 10,000-15,000 Lesser and Greater Flamingos at Sewree
Rahmani says there is record of 150 bird species, including resident and migratory, in the area where the proposed MTHL will start. “BirdLife International and BNHS have designated the area as Important Bird Area (IBA) and have also identified it as a potential Ramsar Site,” he adds. The bird species found in the area include greater and lesser flamingos, black headed ibis, brown headed gull, whiskered tern eastern imperial eagle and black tailed godwit. The flora in Sewree includes 53 species of vascular plants, 10 mangrove species and 13 mangrove-associated species. Thousands of greater and lesser flamingos migrating from Kutch and beyond prefer Sewree mudflats and Thane creek due to ample availability of feed, including blue green algae, crustaceans and molluscs.
MMRDA officials, however, seem unwilling to relent. They have refused to realign the link, citing technical reasons. While responding to BNHS letter in its reply dated November 28, MMRDA, did not mention the realignment of the bridge. “The letter said they will ensure minimum impact on the environment and mitigate environmental risks. However, there was no mention of whether the bridge will be realigned,” says Rahmani.
Project based on outdated EIA report
MMRDA did not respond to a request for a meeting on the issue. BNHS has now decided to rope in civil society members and other like-minded non-profits in the city to devise a strategy to save the Sewree mudflats. Deputy director, BNHS Deepak Apte says the project is proceeding on the basis of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report which was prepared around two decades back. “We do not have any information about a fresh EIA report. So much so that the EIA report referred to by MMRDA is not available for general public,” Apte says.
Thousands of greater and lesser flamingos which migrate from Kutch and beyond prefer Sewree mudflats as it has ample availability of feed
Responding to the BNHS activists’ demands on saving the Sewree mudflats, MMRDA officials have said there was no change in the alignment and say shifting the starting point south will harm the integrity of the Elephanta caves, a heritage site. According to an MMRDA official, who did not wish to be named, “The objections of BNHS regarding the flamingo destruction are uncalled for. It is just a matter of couple of years till the construction on shore is completed. Rest of the construction is to be done in the deep sea. It will not affect the birds.” The official says the alignment has already taken care of the mudflats which attract flamingos every year”. “MMRDA is open to any practical suggestion made by those serious about the implementation of the project,” he adds.
The project is currently in the bid-stage with over 175 bidders expressing interest in constructing the bridge road.
This editorial clearly indicates the fact that, as we are moving ahead with time, the developmental issues are taking over the environmental issues. The institutions which are meant to the SO CALLED city authorities, are hardly observed to care about the same. This story only leaves me with a query that is sustainable development just a concept, which finds its place only in the plush corporate documents? Or it can ever in our lives, be an reality too?
The development can be environmentally just only if and when we start rating sustainability of our environment over developmental issues, with due priority to development as well.
Aditi Phansalkar
The government authorities in fact or the Prime Minister can give the Indu Mills land (worth Rs.12,000 crore) in Dadar in Mumbai to Dalit leaders for construction of a memorial in five minutes. But the same government cannot secure a land for constructing a bridge from the Navy or some other Government department in 10 years!!!
What they can easily do is destroy the forest or wetlands which are habitats or birds and or wildlife and go ahead with the excuse that it is the cheapest option available!! Because the wildlife do not have their own voice.
If they don't give the land to the land sharks or encroachers they just grab it and go to the courts. And the dirty politics gives in to their demands. Look at Yawal Sanctuary in Maharashtra. It is said that 1,00,000 hecares of land has already been encroached by land mafias and sold to poor illiterate tribals from Madhya Pradesh.
Anonymous
It may be recalled that the Maharashtra Govt constituted a Steering Group (SG)in February 1981 under the Chairmanship of JRD Tata to study and make a detailed recommendation for establishing transportation link between Bombay and New Bombay in order to decongest old city and provide for well ordained growth of New Bombay.
SG appointed international expert firm Peter & Fraenkel (PF) who recommended a six lane bridge from Sewree to Nhava-Sheva at a cost of Rs. 365 cr (yes, present cost is Rs. 9,900 cr). The bored subsea tunnel (with no environmental impact) was ruled out only because it was costlier by some Rs. 50 cr. Since the subsea tunnel was relatively new concept and PF had no experts in that field, a proper techno-economical-environmental comparative assessment was not made. There were several Feasibility Studies (FS) conducted for MTHL in the last three decades, all of them focused on only bridge option. One more FS is ongoing following the same trend.
The bridge option was opposed by (i) BARC for security reasons, (ii) Archeological Deptt for pollution at Elephanta, (iii) Environmentalist to save mangroves and visiting flamingoes at Sewree mudflats and (iv) Mumbai port for safety of oil pipelines and installations at Pirpau. Except the environmentalists, all others (being government entities) have accepted the project now. It is not understood how and where the Mumbai Port will replace old / add new pipelines and jetty when the need arises after bridge piers at every 50/60 m are constructed. These facilities are the lifeline of Mumbai Port Trust(MbPT) and oil refineries at Chembur and any damage will impact MbPT and refineries very badly.
Government shall initiate measures like high taxes, restriction on entry to congested city centers, congestion surcharge, etc. to decongest the city. The idea of spending Rs. 4,000 cr as VGF and another 20% soft loan for the MTHL contractor just for evacuation of some 45,000 vehicles is not understood. This VGF and soft loan is another form of subsidy. Government shall promote more efficient rail, metro and other public transport mode rather than supporting ever increasing private vehicles.
When PF was carrying out FS, Norway built its first subsea tunnel in 1983. Now it has more than two dozen subsea tunnels. The cost of subsea tunnels is reportedly now comparable with bridge construction. MMRDA is now planning for Colaba-Bandra-Seepz underground metro link. If the purpose of MTHL is to decongest Mumbai, a perpendicular underground Metro link from Worli to New Mumbai with a crossing at proposed Terminal at Parel should be studied in detail. Then, there will be no need also for an elevated Harbour Line as is being planned now.
The excavated soil and rock from the underground and subsea metro shall be used to construct a new artificial island between Jawahar Dweep (Butcher Island) and Sewri for installation of much delayed grand Shivaji Statue, INS Vikrant and also the proposed Oceanarium planned at Taraporewala Aquarium. This island shall be connected with the subsea metro station by elevators. This will a very big tourist attraction and can finance all the cost of construction of Metro.
MMRDA has marred the beautiful Mumbai city by constructing aesthetically appalling and poorly planned flyovers all over. Any plan for construction of new flyovers or elevated links shall be thoroughly examined by a Steering Group of eminent personalities. Mr. J R D Tata was available for heading such SG in 1981. Now since Ratan Tata is taking break from corporate affairs and being highly respected, should be made chairman of such SG to bring beautiful Mumbai back.
Prakash Rao
Post new comment