CSE India Gobartimes Rainwater Equity watch CSE store
Down To Earth: Online Science and Environment Magazine                                                                       
 

   HOME | ABOUT US | RENEW SUBSCRIPTION | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVES | SEND A CARD | WRITE TO US

Click here to login


Feb  28, 2006

THIS ISSUE

Letters

Editor's Page

News

Analysis

Cover Story

Interview

Debate

Factsheet

Opinion

News Briefs

Features

Media & Review

    Web Exclusives


cse jobs

Analysis

E-Mail
Email
| Print
Print
| Comment
Comment
Water budget

All that you wanted to know about water management schemes, but didn’t know who to ask

The Union budget of 2005-06 had given the impression that the United Progressive Alliance (upa) government had a plan to promote water conservation and management. With the 2006-07 budget round the corner, now is a good time to look at how serious was upa’s water plan.

Last year’s performance in the water sector was characterised by two features: reduced allocations and slow progress. Several ambitious upa schemes — the national scheme for artificial recharge is a case in point — are yet to take off, reduced to arcane acronyms.

Policy matters also gathered dust. With 2006-07 being the last financial year of 10th Five-Year Plan, the Union ministries of finance and water resources will need a magic wand to get anywhere close to meeting the goals laid down by the Planning Commission.

S V Suersh Babu and Ritu Tanwar got into India’s water macro economics. Here, they consider some schemes and policies in detail. They came up with two neat categories: the ones that got underway and haven’t yielded results; and the ones that haven’t got off the block

Comment Tell us what you think about this story
1 2 3 4 5
( # 1 of 5 )
TERMS | ADVERTISE | RECOMMEND THIS SITE | CONTRIBUTE | CSE HOME 
CSE LIBRARY | CSE NEWSLETTER 


Copyright © Society for Environmental Communications