France sends top official to allay fears over Jaitapur nuclear power plant

Wednesday 30 November 2011

Areva's technology has been approved by nuclear safety authorities of three nations, says chief of French atomic energy commission

Atomic EnergyFollowing the stiff opposition in India to the proposed 9,900 (1,650x6) MW Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant (JNPP), near Ratnagiri in Maharashtra, the French government is doing its utmost to allay the fears of civil society by sending its top officials to explain the safety of Areva’s Evolutionary Pressurised Reactors (EPR) which are to be to be used at Jaitapur.

Bernard Bigot, chairperson of the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission, told reporters on Monday that nuclear safety authorities from Finland, France and the UK have approved the design of the EPR reactors. The evaluation of EPRs was carried out after the April 2011 earthquake in Fukushima, Japan, which was followed by a massive Tsunami, triggering a nuclear accident in the 40-year-old Daiichi nuclear power plant. Bigot was speaking to media persons after meeting Srikumar Banerjee, chairperson of Atomic Energy Commission (AEC).


“Various reports have given the green signal to the EPR design as it was found that there are no difficulties in the design. We are hopeful that the first EPR reactor will be working in Flamville in France by 2014. Besides, matters are also going well from the technical point of view, for the reactors in Finland,” he said. The interim report came out on November 10, while the complete report will be available in January, Bigot added.

There has been a great deal of opposition to the EPRs over the faulty design which has allegedly led to the delay in executing the nuclear projects in Finland and France. Anti-nuclear activists had questioned the safety of EPRs, but Bigot said that the first reactor at Flamville would be functional when installation begins at Jaitapur.

Referring to problems caused by earthquakes, Bigot declared that the Jaitapur plant was designed to withstand powerful jolts. “The plant can sustain an earthquake measuring up to 7.5 on Richter scale,” he said.

Reasserting French government’s stand on addressing safety concerns raised by various activists and organisations, Bigot said, “It is always necessary address the concerns and satisfy objections instead of setting up a project against popular resistance. Transparency is our top priority and it is the only way to move forward, when it comes to nuclear power. Nothing should be kept hidden.”

Move from news to views and get in-depth reports on issues that matter to you, every fortnight.
Subscribe now »

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • French politicians of

    French politicians of different political parties have already demanded that the EPR be scrapped, on grounds of enormous cost overrun, design shortcomings, construction flaws, questionable safety, and in the context of global doubts on the long-term viability of nuclear power. Therefore it remains to be seen if the Flamanville EPR really starts in 2014 as claimed by AREVA... or never!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 7 years ago | Reply
  • Truly incredible

    Truly incredible quote:

    "Transparency is our top priority and it is the only way to move forward, when it comes to nuclear power. Nothing should be kept hidden."

    Why then was Europe's largest nuclear waste processing plant at La Hague, France, "sold" to the locals in 1955 as an "aluminium kitchenware plant"?

    All nuclear projects in France have been forced on locals through deception, disinformation and corruption of local authorities.

    Several French MPs have denounced the 2006 law on nuclear waste a "legalisation of corruption".

    How credible is Mr. Bigot's claim?

    Posted by: Anonymous | 7 years ago | Reply
Scroll To Top