Norwegian pension fund, banks invest in polluting Indian steel mill

Wednesday 12 December 2012

Foreign investors in India ignore green performance of industries

Fly ash dump site within Monnet Ispat and Energy, Raigarh Source: CSE library

Over the past seven years or so, there has been a flurry of heavy industry projects in India. The many new greenfield and expansion projects lined up for clearance at the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has left officials wondering about their massive capital expenditure plans and source of funding. A few of them have a track record of high pollution levels, too. A possible answer: easy money coming from foreign institutional investors (including pension funds) and renowned global banks—all seeking better returns on their investment.

A good case in point is the steel mill, Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited. A recent study by Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a Delhi non-profit, showed there were complaints of severe pollution against the company’s flagship sponge iron manufacturing facility at Kharsia town in Raigarh district of Chhattisgarh state. The complaints were made by the local community, including a nearby school.

The survey, carried out under CSE’s Green Rating Project (GRP) in 2011, observed non-compliance with air emissions norms by the sponge iron manufacturing facility and unsystematic dumping of flyash (see pictures).

“The flyash from the Monnet plant is getting mixed with waste water discharge and is entering the Rakshapali village water body, contaminating it. The pond has become unfit for domestic use,” said Shyamlal, resident of the village.

The students of Jawahar Navodaya School near Monnet Ispat constantly complain of eye itching and irritation problems because of heavy dust emissions of fine particulate matter

A residential school, called Jawahar Navodaya, with 540 children studying there, is the other victim. Razia Beebi, principal of the school, said that flyash dumping in the southern boundary of the plant is too close to the school. She added that the plant was started in 2005, much after the establishment of the school.

The flyash dust gets air-borne and falls on the school premises. The students constantly complain of itching of eyes and skin irritation problems because of heavy dust emissions of fine particulate matter, she said.

“The major problem in Monnet Ispat, Raigarh is the flyash disposal from the unit’s 90 MW captive power plant, from where surplus power is sold,” agreed John Lakra, regional officer of Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board (CECB). “There is no ash-dyke facility available at the unit. Neither was generating and selling of significant amount of coal-based power envisaged during the clearance,” he added.

Meanwhile, CSE found that the major public shareholders of the company were feted global banks and a Norwegian pension fund.

The Government Pension Fund Global holds a 1.01 per cent equity stake in Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited as on quarter ended September, 2012. Further investigation by CSE found that the fund is run on behalf of the Norwegian government, through its finance ministry. The website for the parent fund, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) states, “The ministry regularly transfers petroleum revenue to the fund.”  This sovereign wealth fund of Norway is the world's largest with assets totalling US $650 billion.

Responsible investment policy ignored

What’s more alarming is that parent fund, NBIM, claims it has a policy for responsible investment: “As a responsible investor, NBIM regards good return in the long term to be dependent upon sustainable development in economic, environmental and social terms, as well as well-functioning, legitimate and effective markets. NBIM will act as a principle-based responsible owner focusing on long-term issues to safeguard the fund's financial interests.” Evidently, the investment in Monnet Ispat in India contradicts its investment governance policies.

Top public shareholders of Monnet Ispat (as on quarter ended September 2012)

No. Name of the Shareholder Total Shares held Shares as % of Total No. of Shares
1 Deutsche Securities Mauritius Ltd 5,018,540      7.83
2 Blackstone GPV Capital Partner Mauritius 4,567,647      7.13
3 Vistabrook Ltd 3,792,702      5.92
4 Goldman Sachs Investments (Mauritius) I Ltd 1,835,462      2.86
5 Mavi Investment Fund Ltd 1,622,735      2.53
6 Copthall Mauritius Investment Ltd 1,086,484      1.7
7 J. Caired BMD MB 904,935      1.41
8 J. Caired MB 840,852      1.31
9 Religare Finvest Ltd 683,795      1.07
10 Government Pension Fund Global  (Norwegian Pension fund) 645,869      1.01
  Total 20,999,021     32.77
as viewed on 12 December 2012

Even blue chip global banks were found investing in the polluting company. A fund from Deutsche Bank, headquartered in Germany, held a staggering 7.83 per cent as of September, while the fund from US-headquartered Goldman Sachs held 2.86 per cent stake. Further, Blackstone Partners, the famed global private equity (PE) player held a massive 7.13 per cent stake. A Blackstone representative, Amit Dixit, also sits on the Board of the company.

The investment pattern for these banks and PE players, too, is clearly contrary to their stated social responsible investment policies (see box).

“All these investment flows are because of the high profit margin of the company, while disregarding the real pollution impacts that severely affect the local community and ecology," said a senior researcher at CSE. “When it comes to India, clearly it is found that global financial institutions and banks turn a blind eye to their Environment Safety and Governance (ESG) policies,” he added.

Environment Safety and Governance (ESG) policies of global major banks
1) Deutsche Bank

Environmental and social risk framework: The framework is supported by an Environmental and Social Impact Checklist, which provides guidance on how to further evaluate the impacts of those transactions deemed medium or high risk. It includes considerations as to whether the activity we are being asked to finance may be harmful to the environment, or could contribute to increased carbon emissions.

Examples of issues addressed in the Environmental and Social Impact Checklist:
  • Assessment of the baseline environment and social conditions
  • Consideration of feasible environmentally and socially preferable alternatives
  • Protection of human rights and community health, safety and security protection, and conservation of biodiversity, including endangered species and sensitive ecosystems
  • Socio-economic impacts
  • Pollution prevention and waste minimization, pollution controls (liquid effluents and air emissions), and solid and chemical waste management
  • Efficient production, delivery, and use of energy


2) Goldman Sachs

A healthy global environment supports the growth of economies and communities. As a firm, we depend on strong and sustainable economies and communities to survive and thrive. We take seriously our responsibility for environmental and social stewardship and are committed to leveraging our people, capital and ideas to create effective market-based solutions that help address critical environmental issues.

Across our business selection decisions, we take into consideration environmental and social impacts and practices of our clients and potential clients. This is in line with our commitment to environmental and social stewardship, prudent risk management, and serving the best interests of our clients.


3) Blackstone Private Equity

Blackstone believes that protecting the environment of the communities in which we operate is critically important. Responsible environmental stewardship is vital for health and social reasons and ultimately impacts our business.



Read CECB letter to Monnet Ispat: CECB Direction 17th March 2011 (pdf)



Move from news to views and get in-depth reports on issues that matter to you, every fortnight.
Subscribe now »

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Stained steel

Stained steel

The iron and steel sector is regarded as the core of Indian economy. Its players are big and powerful. It is extremely resource-intensive and polluting. On top of this, it is expanding at a phenomenal rate. This makes the sector a fit case for environmental scrutiny. Delhi non-profit Centre for Science and Environment studied the sector for two years to prepare its environmental profile and rate the performance of its top companies. The exercise undertaken by its Green Rating Project sprang a surprise: the steel sector is struggling to meet even the minimum statutory pollution norms. State pollution control boards do not have the capacity to monitor and regulate these behemoths. What’s worse, the sector is non-transparent and shy of public scrutiny—more than any other sector rated by the project in the past. The first independent assessment of the steel sector also found it is wasteful in resource use. This is a cause for concern because steel production in the country is likely to increase five times in the next two decades. At this rate, the industry’s energy, water, land and iron ore demand will be immense and unsustainable. The GREEN RATING TEAM presents a report card, assesses the challenges before the steel industry and suggests a course correction.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

Scroll To Top