Solar power plants' output high, but varying widely

Larger projects under National Solar Mission doing better than smaller ones

solar

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) recently released data of power generation from solar plants constructed under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM) for the month of November. And the results span from very good to dismal.

November means short days for the solar plants, but according to Vineet Mittal, managing director of Welspun Energy, a solar power developer: “November is one of the better months with no rain or dust and with lower temperatures, closer to the conditions they are made for, increasing output from the cells.” Efficiency of Solar Power plants is measured by the Capacity Utilization Factor (CUF), that is, how much of the stated capacity a plant actually generates compared to its total possible capacity in a laboratory with constant light. The higher the CUF, the more efficient the plant is at producing energy from the sun. Due to weather and the unmissable fact that the sun is only available half the day, a 5 MW plant is expected to generate about 1 MW of electricity per hour on an average.

The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) has set 19 per cent CUF as the norm. Of the 30 planned 5 MW photovoltaic (PV) solar power projects in the first batch of the solar mission, only 21 plants are reporting any production—a few of the plants were cancelled at bidding or due to delays—but about 20 MW of capacity is still missing from production figures. The producing plants have an average CUF of 19.48 per cent. All but four of the reportedly generating plants are situated in Rajasthan.

Videocon-backed Northwest Energy's 5 MW project in Rawra village in Jaisalmer district has the best figures for managing CUF of 23.60 per cent in November with an output of 839 MWh of clean power. That is enough to provide power to about 12,500 people.

While most solar power projects have been built in Rajasthan, one project doing well is Welspun Energy's 5 MW plant in Thummala village in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh with a CUF of 21.71 per cent with an output of 771 MWh, which is enough for 11,500 people. Mittal says, “High generation comes from investing in talent, finding the right location through radiation data and using the right solar modules for the right area. The same technology may not be optimal in all parts of the country." On why Welspun Energy opted for Andhra Pradesh while most projects under JNNSM have been set up in Rajasthan, he said: "We wanted to explore more arid zones of the country and our plant generating as much as those in the northwest of the country shows that other states are feasible."

The worst performing 5 MW projects (among the ones producing any noticable output) is EMC Limited in Uttar Pradesh. with a CUF of 14.97 per cent.

The best and the worst - JNNSM Batch 1 Projects (5 MW)
  Name Place Capacity Utilization Factor (in per cent)
The Best Northwest Energy (Videocon) Rawra Village, Jodhpur District, Rajasthan 23.6
  Welspun Energy Thummala Village, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh 21.71
The Worst* Electrical Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (EMC) Naini, Allahabad District, Uttar Pradesh 14.97
  Punj Lloyd Solar Power Bap, Jodhpur District, Rajasthan 16.98
*Not including plants not reporting or reporting no generation


The best and the worst - RPSSGP Projects (1-2 MW)
  Name Place Capacity Utilization Factor (in per cent)
The Best RL Clean Power Tamil Nadu 21.05
  Sepset Construction Ltd. Maharasthra 19.21
The Worst* H.R. Minerals and Alloys Haryana 10.51
  Priapus Infrastructure Uttar Pradesh 8.42
*Not including plants not reporting or reporting no generation


As part of the JNNSM a separate programme, the Rooftop PV and Small Solar Power Generation Programme (RPSSGP), was set up for 1-2 MW PV solar power plants. The generation figures for these plants are more varied, but generally much worse, averaging a CUF of only 15.56 per cent for November. Although the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA), the agency in charge of the RPSSGP, is reporting that 69 projects have been commissioned, only 38 of those are reporting generation data with few plants reaching expected output levels. As Mittal states, "Many developers are coming into the market right now with little experience. A solar power project demands good engineering and the smaller projects may have come in with little background in solar.”
 
The Gujarat State Mission with an installed capacity of 702 MW, more than half of all capacity in the country, is reporting an overall average CUF of 18.8 per cent for the state in November,  according to the Gujarat State Load Dispatch Centre.

image

image

 

An unviable route

An unviable route

Draft of national solar mission’s second phase fails to learn from past mistakes

Solar trick

Solar trick

A number of solar mission projects operational only on paper

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Hi Jonas, Your article is

    Hi Jonas, Your article is very insightful. However, I had a query and would like you to answer the same. You mention that ÔÇ£Northwest Energy's 5 MW project in Rawra village in Jaisalmer district has the best figures for managing CUF of 23.60 per cent in November with an output of 839 MWh of clean power.ÔÇØ But my calculations indicate an output of 849 MWh of clean power instead since 5 MW * 24 Hours * 30 Days * 23.6% CUF = 849.6 MWh. You say that Welspun EnergyÔÇÖs 5 MW plant in Thummala village managed a CUF of 21.71 per cent for an output of 771 MWh. Which according to me is 781.6MWh, since 5 MW * 24 Hours * 30 Days * 21.71% CUF = 781.6 MWh. Could you please help me understand this? Regards, Manish

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Dear Manish, I agree that

    Dear Manish, I agree that your calculations are right, however I took the statistics directly from MNRE's document (http://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/UserFiles/export-nov12-nvvn.pdf). There could be factors not given in the document that change the numbers slightly - a plant could in fact be 5.2 or 4.8 MW (as an example) and they might perhaps count CUF at the plant switch yard while counting exported units at the substation. Sometimes CUF is also counted on 330 or so days (as in only counting the sunny days of the year... which to me is very confusing.) I am not sure what has happened but I decided to go by the figures given. Hope that helps. Best Regards,

    Posted by: Jonas Hamberg | 3 years ago | Reply
Scroll To Top