Supreme Court reminder to FSSAI on monitoring pesticides in food commodities

Non-profit Centre for Science and Environment says food regulatory body should also periodically test packaged and processed food, including soft drinks, for pesticides

The Supreme Court on Tuesday held the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) responsible for monitoring and exercising control on soft drinks as per the rules, regulations and provisions in the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006. The court said this while delivering a judgement disposing of a case relating to use of chemical additives in soft drinks.

The public interest petition was about a regulatory regime for monitoring chemical additives in foods, including soft drinks and disclosure of contents and warnings. The petition had sought constitution of an independent expert committee to evaluate the harmful effects of chemical additives in food including soft drinks, specifically in children, and controlling misleading advertisements targeting children, less cautious and non-literate people.

The court verdict highlighted the importance of public communication on food safety and risk, food safety surveillance and other monitoring activities covering all stages of the food business.

The apex court also directed FSSAI to conduct periodic inspections and monitoring of major fruits and vegetable markets for presence of pesticide residues.

Delhi non-profit Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in 2003 and 2006 had found high levels of several pesticides in almost all major brands of carbonated beverages  (also see 'Pesticide residues in bottled water),  based on which Union health ministry in 2008 notified standards for individual pesticides in carbonated beverages to 1ppb (parts per billion). Going by the judgement of the apex court, FSSAI will have to put in public domain all information about pesticides and chemicals that have been tested while monitoring for compliance of standards since 2008.

Overhaul framework to regulate ads

CSE believes that the current regulatory framework with respect to advertisements of soft drinks as per the FSS Act and Advertising Standards Council of India code is not good enough and needs to be revised. Globally, there is an increasing body of evidence, demonstrating a strong linkage between obesity and non-communicable diseases, in children particularly, and advertisements of cola drinks and other junk food items.

Further, CSE believes that periodic testing and monitoring by the FSSAI should not be limited to raw fruits and vegetables. Packaged and processed food commodities, including soft drinks should also be tested.



Asks it to reconstitute panels examining the harmful effects of chemicals and toxins in carbonated beverages and other food items


12 brands of cold drinks put to the test the coolest event of our times. They put to the test the most aggressive, glitzy, gutsy, premium, imaginative, high-quality, expensive and successful attempt to globally grab people’s stomach share. As it turns out, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Diet Pepsi, Mirinda orange, Mirinda lemon, Blue Pepsi, 7-Up, Coca-Cola, Fanta, Limca, Sprite, and Thums Up are ...


Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Just wanted to ask one thing

    Just wanted to ask one thing that you people did an excellent job in exposing these Cola companies, but it has been long time we have not found your work getting enough media space.

    Why ?

    Years before you had an magazine regarding consumer rights, is it still there ?

    Posted by: Anonymous | 2 years ago | Reply
Scroll To Top