
There is no straight jacket solution for the geo-politics and lobbying, In due course the developed nations would see good...
We always talk on rich and poor countries but we rarely talk or discuss the issue “how to reduce the greenhouse gases...
Stop Industrial Anarchy
The gas leak at Bhopal inflicted enough injury on the victims. The injury mounted in the following decades.
The killer corporation, Indian industries body, judiciary, the Government and the politicians added to that injury, by doing nothing. The worst injury came from the verdict that almost let off every culprit with a minimum punishment. This could happen only because the legal framework to control hazardous industries is very weak.
And now, government’s persistent resistance to make industry more liable for accidents looks like insult added to the Bhopal injury. The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill is a case in point. Indian government estimated cost of Bhopal disaster at US$ 3 billion. But Supreme Court had settled all liability for Bhopal at US$ 470 million [Rs 2350 crore] in 1989, and that was absolutely a small amount compared to the damage. The nuclear liability bill wants to cap the operators’ liability at a meagre sum of Rs 500 crore per accident! The rest will go from public exchequer. Look at Chernobyl accident. The damage so far has been estimated at US$ 250 billion.
[See, World's worst industrial disasters, industry category and death toll]
And the damage is not only about immediate and direct human beings. There are long term environmental implications of these accidents. Who will pay for the damage of nature? CSE has conclusively shown how groundwater of Bhopal is being contaminated by the killer plants stockpile. The current oil spill by BP in the Gulf of Mexico is also a rude reminder.
Dear friends, it is clear that industry and government know that there will be more accidents coming up! [Anyway, progress means playing with dangerous stuff!] Otherwise, why would the industry lobby against a stricter liability clause and lawmakers would buy that? Common sense tells us that stricter liability works as a deterrent. It will force the company to think thousand times before cutting corners and compromising public health.
Industry’s reluctance to stricter liability is understandable. Their right to profit also includes right to kill. While the going is good, they will make profit. If any accident happens, they expect government, read public money to take care of it. [Just like the financial crisis]
But the government is ours. We cannot just criticise and sit back. Let us all work towards making our government work for us, not for industry.
Right now, a fistful of Bhopal activists is screaming. Join them to secure future.
Say ‘no’ to industrial anarchy.
The foolish "non-liability" nuclear bill which is proposed by the Indian government throws a strong light on the nuclear industry and other high-risk technologies. It gives ordinary citizens, who did not have the possibility to spend years to study nuclear physics, the opportunity to have a direct and unbiased look at the nuclear industry's OWN ASSESSMENT of its risk and economic viability problems. If nuclear industry was really as reliable and as efficient as it has been repeated by countless "scientific" and technological reasonings by the industry's propaganda since the last 50 years, what is the need today for an ad-hoc, un-precedented in this country, "non-liability" law?
If this technology is "safe enough" for our lives and the country, could it not be "safe enough" for the investors' money?
If it was really profitable, why a free and unlimited government-backed insurance cover?
If the NUCLEAR INDUSTRY believe their technology is dangerous and not economically viable, why should WE subsidise its proliferation?
Public subsidies must go only to PEOPLE-FRIENDLY, COST-EFFECTIVE and SUSTAINABLE energy sources.
Laurent Fournier
Dear Concerned
Bhopal Gap Tragedy (BGT) is the good practical lesson for all. This should be viewed in two ways as:
On one side, it is the real tragedy for the affected directly and indirectly for all the common people.
On the other side, it is a channel/model to escape after eating the cake of the business.
In the process of Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization (LPG), the development has to be optimized in respect of its resources, needs and environment with better sustainability and quality.
After so much of time, still the issue is not settled and spending money on this battle. Why this is happening? Is it due to the lack of policies or its implementation????
Hope to see the better way to settle the issue and learn lesson not to get such things repeated.
Looking forward for creating healthy and friendly environment with matching development at all levels in all areas....
with thanks
N Lakshmi Narayana
Post new comment