Dear Saxena ji,
Thank you for inquiry.
West facing windows can be a big source of heat, first measure which you...
Why all these are not applicable to Tuticorin port or the one planned in AP or WB ?
What an eye opener! As an environmental engineer,disposal of sanitary napkins has always been a concern during waste...
will the mid-term review of the 10th five-year plan mark its end? Or will it be used to make the rest of the plan push towards the implementation of the United Progressive Alliance's (upa) common minimum programme (cmp)? Before the more than 350 experts review the 10th plan, the process has got immersed in a controversy. While bureaucrats and advisors in the Planning Commission strongly resist the move to abandon the plan mid-way, the government seems adamant about tuning it according to the cmp.
The Union government announced the review in August 2004. The Commission's new members, appointed after the formation of the upa government, claim it is a process of prioritising within the five-year plan and not of disbanding it. The government has already formed 21 committees to conduct the review. The review report would be made ready by December 2004 and debated in the National Development Council meeting in January 2005.
"There is a tug of war between the new members and the Commission's consultants and staff," says a consultant, who does not want to be named. But Kirit S Parikh, a member of the Commission, disagrees: "We all agree with the cmp. I don't see any pressure tactics from the government." The Commission's bureaucrats believe readjustments in the five-year plan would be a waste of the time and money spent in the past two-and-a-half years. But new members feel it is necessary, given the upa's philosophy of liberalisation with a human face.
Speculations about the 10th plan being totally disbanded were rife ever since the upa government took over in May 2004. Consultants and advisors claim they resisted moves to redraft the plan in at least six meetings held after new members were appointed. "That time the issue was to resist any move to abandon the plan right away but later the mid-term review popped up as a way to push the new government's programmes," says an advisor.
If the 10th plan is reworked, this would be the first time a mid-term review is used for substantially reframing a five-year plan. In 1978, the Janata Party government had terminated the fifth five-year plan (1974-79) of the previous Congress government. In 1980, the Congress government changed the sixth five-year plan (1978-83) of the Janata Party government.
The review is being monitored directly by the prime minister's office, which has directed all ministries to facilitate the process. The 21 committees would examine the Commission's internal evaluation of programmes. Experts believe the review would focus on agriculture, employment generation and food security programmes. The briefing is clear: stress on 'schemes in need of greater focus' (see box: Task at hand).