icrn phw energy cse dte gobar times rwh csestore iep
Contents page
Dec 15-31, 2005

Cover Story

The Centre for Science and Environment's Green Rating Project team has rated the cement industry. Its findings uncovered some surprises. The traditional wisdom was that the industry had to be a big-time polluter. But what emerged was a more nuanced picture. The cement industry scored better than any other rated by the project on many counts, but it bombed on others. Where economic logic met environmental objectives, the industry did well -- for instance, energy-use and utilisation of waste. But where investments did not yield short-term gains, the industry failed to meet expectations: in mine management, emission control and, most importantly, regenerating livelihoods. Societally, the industry is dismal, especially because the biggest players are not going out of their way to set standards. What follows is the green project's cement take

Editor's page

We got off the train at Abu Road station in Rajasthan to visit two cement plants located in the nearby district of Sirohi. The drive was predictable -- dry stretches interspersed with marginal agriculture and signs of livestock grazing. But I was keenly waiting for signs of the trees covered with white dust that would signal our arrival to the cement factory. Cement, after all, is known to be incredibly polluting with its emissions and dust from raw materials smothering nearby inhabitants.

News

On JPC report on pesticide residues in beverages

Bureaucrats who hid information head RTI commissions today

Communities in Rajasthan reject draft wasteland policy

UNICEF in dock over vitamin A fortification programme

Aspartame, a sugar substitute, increases cancer risk

Himachal project runs into widespread protests

Contaminated baby milk products recalled in EU

Finally a plan to reform the concrete jungles

Drug inventors row over profits from avian flu

Rehabilitation package for Polavaram modified

HIV/AIDS drug prices in India come down

West African countries sign elephant conservation pact

After Veerappan, granite mining troubles

Levels of greenhouse gases at a 650,000-year peak

How an Indian remedy works

Genetically modified peas induce allergies in mice

To control cholera

Did grass figure in them?

Using hydrogen as fuel

Effluents pollute Kalingarayan canal in Tamil Nadu

Energy crisis jacks up prices, creates supply problems

River restoration project goes into overdrive

Bioscience get short shrift in UNESCO document

Interview

Eminent agricultural scientist and chairperson, National Commission for Farmers (NCF), M S Swaminathan talks to Sourav Misra on agricultural re...

Factsheet

Increasing number of employees fall victim to accidents and diseases

Analysis

Bangalore is in the throes of a water privatisation debate. But the most critical flaws in a new plan for its suburbs have got missed out. s vsuresh babu decodes

Feature

Hermit crabs aren't fussy creatures. Faced with a housing crunch, in many parts of the world, they have taken up abode in plastic and junk left by humans. But this is not without peril

A Down To Earth reporter refused a windfall to not do this story

Debate

Can the UK juggle energy demands and Kyoto Protocol commitments

The iucn' s Red List for prioritising species for protection is beset by serious flaws

Opinion

Water privatisation in IT capital is taking citizens for a long ride

Forget the Internet. Welcome to roadblocks on the information route

Letters

Carbon credits

I really liked the article on Clean Development Mechanism (cdm) ('Newest biggest deal', Down To Earth, November 15, 2005) and agree with most of your key points, especially concerning the role of shoddy consultants, the flimsy stakeholder consultation documentation, non-sustainable biopower plants and the clearance to problematic projects by the Indian cdm authority. But I have some critical comments:

CSE WEBNET
Follow us ON
Follow grebbo on Twitter    Google Plus  DTE Youtube  rss