icrn phw energy cse dte gobar times rwh csestore iep
Contents page
Apr 1-15, 2006

Cover Story

The invitation was innocuous. The Confederation of Indian Industry (cii) -- the grouping of the large and most powerful industries -- was convening a meet on forests. The purpose, said the invitation (which reached us by chance), was to discuss how the country would achieve the national target of 33 per cent forest and tree cover by 2012. The minister for environment was the key speaker and the ministry of environment and forests was the co-organiser. The question was: what was industry's interest in planting trees? Why was the ministry associated with this meeting? What was being cooked in this broth?

The fact is that industry's interest in land (not just forests) dates back to the mid-1980s. The proposal is delicious because it is so simple. India has large tracts of lands without tree cover. These are lands classified as forests but lying degraded. The country needs to plant trees. But the government says it lacks funds. Industry says that it needs raw material from forests. It has the capital to pay for planting trees and the technology and managerial ability to do massive afforestation. If trees are planted, the poor will get jobs. This is a win-win option.

But we, who have been tracking the story for the past 20 years, know that the proposal has been on the table for years. It has been pushed, each time with some changes in the detail of the scheme, each time with bigger and bigger players in the fray. The last was in early 2000, when Reliance Industries almost secured rights over forests of Andhra Pradesh. But still, each time the proposal has been rejected because it is understood that it will do nothing for poor people who depend on the forests and nothing even for the forests it aims to protect.

But if this is known, why the renewed interest? What does the newest look of the old proposal promise? What position does this government, with its common minimum programme, take on this idea, which has been the bugbear of tribal activists and environmentalists for many years? Nitin Sethi investigates history and current affairs to uncover the newest deal.

More...

Editor's page

Everybody knows one hand of the government does not know what the other is up to. But it does make a difference when a proposed programme of the government contradicts and, perhaps, even fatally undermines a flagship initiative. This is the case with the proposed programme of the Union ministry of environment and forests -- euphemistically called the multi-stakeholder partnership on forests -- and its impact on the prime minister's pet projects of employment generation like the Bharat Nirman project.

News

Bird flu resurfaces, exposes weakness of testing system

Labourers in Tripura plantations get a better deal

Narmada dam gets boost, faces opposition

Seismic zoning map for the country underestimates risk

Carnivores play the key role in keeping the earth green

WB chokes Lake Victoria

Monsanto breaks its vow

Tsunami experience redefines coastal zones

Kyoto's compliance force begins operation

Carbon sequestration plan in North Sea

EU Commission proposes to diversify energy supplies

A meet on evaluating the value of forests

Conduct epidemiological study, says court

Disease has varied strings, needs differents vaccines

Tribals will be rehabilitated, but how?

Human genes are evolving with changing environment

Biofilter for domestic wastewater

Cheap option to treat effluent

Warehousing Bill, a double-edged sword for farmers

Users may soon have to pay for what they see online

Experts wary of EcoSecurities' entry into Indian market

Interview

Graham Brookes, an agricultural economist and director of the UK-based PG Economics limited, a research and consultancy organisation, has authored a study on ge...

Factsheet

Bottled water is heavily taxing the world's ecosystem

Analysis

Vaccines with mercury can cause autism, but removing the metal is uneconomical for developing countries such as India

Feature

South American cane toads introduced into Australia to check sugarcane pests have become a menace

Lisus, Namdapha officials 'talk' in Arunachal

Typhoid could have caused the fall of the powerful city state during the Peloponnesian wars, says a new study

Debate

Subsidy cuts and differential taxation are energy options, says proposal

Assam's Dhemaji district faces extermination by floods

Traditional architecture makes for better homes

Opinion

Winter haze caused by thermal plants, not biomass burning

Archbishop of Canterbury strikes a blow for reason

Letters

Poultry cooperatives

Apropos of your editorial ('Poultry business too serious to be left to industry', Down To Earth, March 15, 2006), I would like to mention the approach adopted by us in pradan, which is promoting small-holder broiler poultry in large areas of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh.

CSE WEBNET
Follow us ON
Follow grebbo on Twitter    Google Plus  DTE Youtube  rss