A team of British scientists analysed what has generally been accepted as the world's oldest fossils of bacteria, embedded in 3.5-billion-year-old rocks from western Australia, and they concluded that the rocks had never been more than non-living rocks. "None of the structures we see there we would interpret as fossils," said Martin D Brasier, a geobiologist at UK-based Oxford University and the lead author of the study. Rather, he said, the structures are merely tiny flaws in the rock, mineral filaments that formed around small crystals of silica. However, scientists led by J William Schopf, a professor of paleobiology at the University of California, USA, who first described the features as fossils in 1993, argue that they now have even better evidence that the features are indeed fossils.
O
P
E
N
Standard texts mention perepheral role of nutrition in therapy of tuberculosis.Perhaps this is done to emphasise the role of...
The main culprit in this second instance as the first, is the dysfunctional regulatory system. The blame must be nailed on...
Is Narmada water being made to flow in Sabarmati not supplied to city of Ahmedabad? This has furthered the idea of river...