Good job bringing this to light. People won't realise how huge the problem is and municipalities are woefully ill equipped to...
Agreed; mining can never be sustainable, but then how do you get the metals to make all the things you need in the course of...
Very good piece.
uk's national campaign to reduce resistance to the antibiotic sulphonamide has not worked, say researchers. And they put part blame for the rise of treatment-resistant bacteria on the overuse of antibiotics.
Over time, as bacteria are frequently exposed to a given antibiotic the bugs that survive mutate in order to resist the drug. In 1995 uk had restricted the use of the antibiotic in order to reverse the growing trend of sulphonamide-resistant bacteria. The result was a huge decline in sulphonamide prescriptions. But that has not affected the resistance developed by the bacteria ( Lancet , Vol 357, p1307).
A team led by Lucinda M C Hall, researcher at the St Bartholomew's and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, uk , tested samples of Eschirichia coli bacteria collected in 1991 and 1999. They found that sulphonamide resistance had actually increased after the imposition of restrictions. Forty six per cent of the 1999 Eschirichia coli samples were found resistant, compared with about 40 per cent of the samples collected in 1991. "These results show that a huge decrease in antibiotic prescriptions does not necessarily reduce resistance within a useful time nal prescribing restrictions have so far failed, the researchers offer severaperiod," says Hall.
As for why the natiol explanations. For one, they point out, a decline in sulphonamide resistance may still come with more time. In addition, Hall notes, sulphonamide continued to be widely used on farm animals, which could have allowed resistant bacteria to enter humans through the food chain. It is also possible that sulphonamide resistance persisted because of the other antibiotics that continued to be used during the time sulphonamide was restricted. When bacteria become resistant to one antibiotic, they often develop resistance to others also. In its study, Hall's team found that the sulphonamide-resistant bacteria were resistant to six of the eight other antibiotics tested for. If the uk had limited the use of certain other antibiotics along with sulphonamide, the efforts might have been more successful, says Burke A Cunha, professor at the State University of New York School of Medicine in Stony Brook.
"The study does not argue against a national antibiotic restriction as an effective resistance-control measure," Cunha writes in an editorial accompanying the report. However, he says, uk chose the wrong target. Limiting the use of one drug without treating its 'friends' similarly caused the failure. He recommends that governments restrict the use of what he calls "high resistance potential" antibiotics in humans and ban the addition of antibiotics to animal feed and products. Doctors should also, whenever possible, prescribe drugs with a low resistance potential, Cunha suggests.