.jpg)
MOST POPULAR
- Monsoon arrives early; kills over 30 people in Uttarakhand
- Rains over past three days extreme weather event: scientists
- Pedestrian questions
- Transition failure
- MoEF changes stand on relocation of Dhari Devi temple for Alaknanda dam
- Extreme weather and climate change
- Gujarat pollution board gets a makeover in efficiency 33
- Yamuna set to cross danger mark in Delhi
- Dhari Devi idol goes missing
- Collectors turn entrepreneurs
- Environment ministry wants to restore night traffic through Bandipur tiger reserve 52
- A green facade 45
- Diesel: when bad policy makes for toxic hell 38
- Gujarat pollution board gets a makeover in efficiency 33
- What’s good insulation? 30
- How vulnerable are India's nuclear power plants to disaster 28
- Grand distraction called river interlinking 28
- Eat at your own risk 27
- Green energy takes toll on green cover 26
- Temporary solution, permanent jam 25
FOLLOW US ON
The Fortnight
LEFT UNPROTECTED
0 Comments
Sep 30, 2001 | From the print edition
A US federal judge rejected a request to extend protection to beluga whales in Alaska's Cook Inlet. This ruling was given in response to a lawsuit filed by six environmental groups and an Alaska Native from the Cook Inlet region. They wanted the whale population listed as endangered because pollution and disturbances from sources such as offshore oil operations made the over-hunted whales more vulnerable. But according to the judge, the environmentalists had no evidence to prove that restrictions on industrial, municipal or recreational activities in the inlet would benefit the belugas.
