How come Andhra is left out of the mining loot story ? It is good for the nation if we learn to keep environmental and...
The UN environment report states that Ganga would disappear by 2030.There would be no need to train engineers or even Ganga...
A report published in the Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology suggests that babies of...
If scientists are part of a global community, does that mean there is a uniform pattern in the choices they make? The answer can be both yes and
no, going by the results of a recent survey of Indian scientists. Unlike most of their fraternity in the us and Europe,
an overwhelming 56 per cent scientists in the country prefer a mixed economy; this is consistent with their support for both government and
private funding of science. Twenty one per cent of the respondents preferred the free market.
The study, "Worldviews and Opinions of Scientists in India", which was released at the United Nations in New York last month, has been
conducted by the Institute of the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture (isssc) of Trinity College in Connecticut,
us, and assisted by the Centre for Inquiry India. It sampled 1,100 participants from 130 universities and research
institutes in the country between July 2007 and January 2008. The intent was to conduct a series of surveys in various countries with differing
cultures, in order to learn who today's scientists were and what they thought about contemporary moral and ethical issues.
On the question of ethics, 64 per cent said no to biological weapons while 54 per cent said they would not work to develop nuclear weapons.
Twenty-four per cent respondents rejected human cloning as a professional choice because they did not want to play God.
On the question of God, however, Indian scientists are sharply divided. In 2005, space scientists went to Tirupati to seek the blessing of Lord
Venkateswara before launching a rocket and satellite. Forty-one per cent said they would have done the same. No way, said 46 per cent of the
scientific community with 33 per cent "strongly disapproving" mixing religion and science.