The plant would discharge 6 million cubic metre warm water into the sea daily. NEERI claimed no impact is anticipated on marine life; it reasoned the Kalpakkam nuclear plant (440 MW) has not affected marine life. EIA ignores the size of Jaitapur project; it is 25 times bigger than Kalpakkam and its warm water discharge would be much higher
EIA is silent on the impact of the 2,300 metre-long breakwater (stone barrier) to be built near the sea shore. It would lead to sand deposition south of it near the Vijaydurg creek and confluence of Vaghotan river and the Arabian sea which is rich in marine biodiversity. Sand erosion is likely north of the breakwater near Rajapur creek
Does not provide for permanent storage of radioactive waste
Butterflies on the roof of the world is a vivid and engaging narrative of the author's rendezvous with the butterflies and moths in particular, and nature in general
Is Narmada water being made to flow in Sabarmati not supplied to city of Ahmedabad? This has furthered the idea of river...
Hello,
I have been selling glass for commercial buildings talking about light, thermal/solar heat gain etc.etc..but I...
Dear Saxena ji,
Thank you for inquiry.
West facing windows can be a big source of heat, first measure which you...