-- (Credit: SSMARITIME.COM)new evidence has emerged showing that the Norwegian ship Blue Lady sent to India for dismantling may have
radioactive material on board. Tom Haugen, former project manager of the ship (formerly known as SS Norway), recently submitted a letter in
this regard to the Committee of Technical Experts (cte) set up by the Supreme Court.
Haugen, in the letter, claimed that "the ship has radioactive material Americium 241 on board in at least 5,500 fire detection points. Removing or
handling of radioactive sensors with Americium 241 element has to be done by skilled persons..."
The ship is currently anchored 4,000 feet off the Alang coast in Gujarat. M V Ramana, senior fellow of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in
Environment and Development in Bangalore, says, "Inhaling Americium dust increases chances of cancer."
Presence of the radioactive material, however, was found after cte declared that "presence of radioactive materials in
Blue Lady is unlikely". Subba Rao, the in-charge of the Supreme Court Monitoring Committee and additional director of the Union ministry of
environment and forests refused to comment on the reports that claimed the presence of radioactive material in the ship.
Platform on Shipbreaking, a consortium of labour and trade unions, has questioned the clean chit given by cte for the
entry of Blue Lady into the Indian waters. Questioning the committee's report, the consortium alleged that permitting the ship to dock at the
Indian coast could prove disastrous.
Responding to Platform on Shipbreaking's questions, the Supreme Court on July 26, 2007, asked the Gujarat Pollution Control Board to explain if the
board violated the court's October 2003 directive by allowing the ship to anchor at Alang and then emptying oil from it.
A Supreme Court order in 2003 mandates that all ships need to be decontaminated before they reach Indian shoreline. It is essential that the
quantity of hazardous and non hazardous material on board be revealed to the authority concerned. On June 5, 2006, the Supreme Court allowed
the toxic ship to anchor at Alang on humanitarian grounds.
O
P
E
N
Why all these are not applicable to Tuticorin port or the one planned in AP or WB ?
What an eye opener! As an environmental engineer,disposal of sanitary napkins has always been a concern during waste...
Gap's contentions are quite ridiculous, to say the least. Good to know that GTG is going to fight the case! More power to such...