IT HAPPENS ONLY IN INDIA,
GREAT JOB MR. PARMAR
it is good to eat as many as vegetables and fruits (totally vegetarian), but my aurvedic doctor asked me to stop eating every...
On August 17, 2007, the government of Lithuania formally decided to take the European Commission to the European Court of Justice over reduced
co2 emission allowances (carbon quota) for the next carbon trading period of 2008-2012. With this, it
becomes the seventh country from eastern Europe to take legal action against the eu executive.
Earlier, Lithuania's Baltic neighbours and eastern countries Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia decided to take action
against the commission over carbon quotas, which, they say is too restrictive for their growing economies.
In 2005, the eu set up an emissions trading scheme to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and comply with the Kyoto
protocol. In the first phase of trading--from 2005 to 2007--the eu handed out too many carbon quotas to countries.
This led to carbon price crash and rendered the system ineffective in terms of creating an incentive to reduce emissions. This also underlined the
need for tougher limits during the second phase of carbon trading.
Last year the commission asked each country to submit a national allocation plan, providing an estimate of the total carbon emissions of all their
Lithuania asked for a carbon quota of 16.6 million tonnes a year. The Lithuanian government said after the closure of its Soviet-built nuclear reactor,
it needs to generate power from fossil fuels, a major source of carbon emissions, to meet its power demands. But the commission, allege Lithuanian
officials, ignored the country's plea. It was granted only 8.8 million tonnes of carbon quota.
Lithuania now wants a quota of 11.2 million tonnes. Its neighbour Latvia voices a similar complaint, as its electricity supply also comes from the
same power plant. It had asked for a quota of 6.25 million tonnes, but was allocated just 3.43 million tonnes. These younger members of the class='UCASE'>eu feel their demands are often cut significantly in comparison with the allowances of older members (see table: New
comer's tax). The countries have protested the commission's measures in fixing allowances, and raised questions of equity in relation to
European policy on climate change.