.jpg)
MOST POPULAR
- Man-made reasons for Uttarakhand disaster 1
- Dhari Devi idol goes missing 2
- Pedestrian questions 14
- Gujarat pollution board gets a makeover in efficiency 33
- Transition failure 1
- Where all did extreme events cause disasters last decade
- Rains over past three days extreme weather event: scientists 1
- Monsoon arrives early; kills over 30 people in Uttarakhand
- Rush of hydropower projects on Ganga, tributaries
- Out of turn
- Don’t just cash in on tigers 18
- Pedestrian questions 14
- Weather dice is loaded 13
- “Come elections, our forests are looted” 10
- Odisha's waterman 6
- Kudankulam meltdown 5
- Contaminating millets 4
- Risk of corruption clouds Andhra Pradesh solar bids 4
- Waging war on state 4
- Is Ganga losing its resilience? 4
FOLLOW US ON
Cover Story
Still unsafe
0 Comments
Aug 15, 2006 | From the print edition
Forget Aamir Khan's assurances
The Centre for Science and Environment's Pollution Monitoring Laboratory tested 57 soft drink samples of 11 soft drinks brands. Journalists and researchers travelling for stories collected samples from different states and cities of India -- bought bottles from Burnihat in Meghalaya, Bharuch in Gujarat, Palakkad in Kerala to Jalandhar in Punjab. Unlike the 2003 pesticide in soft drink study, when 36 samples from Delhi were procured, these samples are from 25 different soft drink manufacturing plants spread over 12 states
Tags: Cover Story
