Mining lease for POSCO plant now in legal row
|Kanchi Kohli & Manju Menon
With little groundwork done, the Orissa government signed an m
Korean giant posco
in 2005. It assured the company of requisite clearances and keeping the area free of all
encumbrances. But the state's magnanimity has not made things easy for posco
that plans to set up a Rs
51,000-crore project, including a steel plant and captive port. But after three years, impact assessments haven't been completed, ground surveys
not carried out and the lease for mining has not been secured.In fact, mining lease and forest clearance cases are being heard at the Orissa
High Court and the supreme court. Local people who stand to lose their livelihood to the project have been protesting for long.
is yet to procure permission for extracting 600 million tonnes of iron ore from Khandadhar hills in
Sundergarh district. Media reports indicated that Orissa had granted the mining licences recently. But the state had earlier given away these
mines to the Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited (kiocl
), a public sector undertaking that shut down in Karnataka.
had worked out contracts to set up a beneficiation/pelletization plant but Orissa asked it not to go ahead with
its plans. When the state government's favourable bend towards posco
became obvious, kiocl
took legal recourse. The issue was first heard in the high court. Subsequently, a tribunal in the ministry of mines
heard the matter. On May 30, a business daily reported that Orissa "is all set to recommend the Khandadhar iron ore mines" for posco
, with the formalities to be completed in the first week of June following the tribunal's direction to re-open bids for
requires 600 million tonnes of good quality iron ore for Orissa plant and 400 million tonnes for its
plant in South Korea. Fears are that the Orissa government may have sold its valuable mineral resources cheap, something that both the
Brazilian and Chinese governments resisted despite having the largest reserves and being foreign investment-friendly. The question even liberal
supporters of the project in India asked was why didn't the state government mandate that the ore be bought from the state-owned Orissa Mining
Corporation at market rates. The supreme court's Central Empowered Committee (cec
) suggested the same for
Sterlite Industries India Ltd (principal subsidiary of the Vedanta Resources Group). It recommended that Sterlite purchase the ore based on
bauxite prices listed in the London Stock Exchange where the parent company is listed.
intends to utilize part of the iron ore in its steel plant and ship out the rest through export. The company was
offered facilities of the existing Paradip port but at posco'
s insistence, the mouth of Jatadhar estuary was "cleared"
for the establishment of a captive port. T R Baloo, Union minister of shipping, had written a letter to the Orissa government in 2006 highlighting
concerns on the impacts of setting up a special facility near the existing port. Yet sanctions have been given for the captive port within 12 km of
the Paradip port. Established in 1966, it has consistently logged in growing profits and should have been the first choice to meet posco
The Paradip Port Shramik Sangh says that the traffic of 13 million tonnes of iron ore for posco
can be easily
managed within the 14 cargo berths with an annual capacity of 51.4 million tonnes. In 2006-2007, the port handled 38.52 million tonnes of cargo
from 1,452 cargo ships. The decision to allow the captive port seems to have been made on considerations that don't include maximizing
existing infrastructure. The deputy chairman of Paradip Port Trust has said that a breakwater will be required for the captive port. The definite
effect of this construction on the littoral drift (a geological process by which sediments move along a beach shore) and erosion and accretion of
the shoreline northwards and southwards must be kept in mind.
Following meetings held at the ministry of shipping, it was decided that the
Central Water and Power Research Station, Pune will be asked to conduct an assessment. What is not clear is whether this study was
completed and its findings were used.
That decisions on such projects almost never consider the environmental and social impacts is a foregone conclusion.
The authors are members of Delhi-based Kalpavriksh Environment Action Group
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.