The neutrino, an elementary particle, may not be massless, as assumed
A TEAM of physicists working at the Los
Alamos National Laboratory in the us
claims that it has gathered experimental
evidence suggesting that fundamental
particles called neutrinos are not, as
believed, massless.
Interestingly, the New York Times
printed the story of the discovery,
announced in February, even before the
findings were reported in any journal
or science seminar (Science, Vol 267,
No 5199).
Neutrinos have been an
enigma since they were
first postulated in 1930 to
explain certain anom'alies
in the process of the
radioactive decay of some
substances. Neutrinos are
extremely elusive because
they are neutral and interact weakly with other particles. In.fact, a neutrino
could penetrate right
through the Earth without
interacting with anything
at all.
Neutrinos are an essential part of the particle
physics' Standard Model
- the theoretical framework that provides an
understanding of the basic
forces and particles of
nature. In this model, the
neutrinos-- assumed to be
massless - are of 3 types, or
flavours: the electron- the muonand the tau-neutrinos.
The Los Alamos team used a
phenomenon called "neutrino
oscillations" to test whether neutrinos are massless. It turns out that if
neutrinos have a mass, they can
switch from one type to another in
their path. These oscillations occur at a
rate related to the mass differences of
the different flavours of neutrinos. The
essential idea in the experiment was to
have a neutrino source which has I
flavour missing and then, after the neutrinos travel for a distance, to try and see
if the missing flavour shows up.
The experiment at the Los Alamos
Meson Physics Facility used a proton
beam with a shielded water t4rget. The
interaction generated showers of various elementary particles, including neutrinos and antineutrinos of the muon
variety. These were then allowed to travel about 30 metres into a Liquid
Scintillator Neutrino Detector - a
200,000 litre tank filled with a com
pound that emits flashes of light when
certain interactions occur. This light
was measured by an array of 1,220 light
detecting instruments called photomultiplier tubes. The scintillator was
designed to be sensitive to electron antineutrinos, a flavour that was absent
from the original source. It follows that
any signal detecting such a particle is a
clear indication of neutrino oscillations.
The team reported 80 such events,
40 more than can be accounted for by
any conceivable background interferences such as cosmic ray interactions in
the atmosphere or some other radioactive source. The inference is that the
electron and muon type of neutrinos
have masses in the range of 0.5 and 5
electron volts and a mass
difference of about 2.4
electron volts. (An electron
volt is a unit to measure
extremely small masses
encountered in particle
physics; an electron has a
mass of about 500 Ho electron volts.)
The report has led to a
flurry of activity among
both experimentalists and
theorists. Most physicists
are a bit cautious about
the result and there are
already reports from the
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the UK and the
Brookhaven National Laboratory in the us, contradicting the claims of the
Los Alamos team.
On the theoretical
front, the implications of
this discovery are enormous. If neutrinos have a mass,
then it indicates that our understanding of the basic forces of
nature is incomplete and there is
still physics to be explored
beyond the Standard Model.
This could be in the field of
Grand Unified Theories or
Supersymmetry.
Surprisingly, perhaps the most profound effect of a neutrino mass would
be felt in the realm of cosmology. A
massive neutrino would be the natural
candidate for 'dark matter', invisible
matter believed to comprise the bulk of
the mass of the universe.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.