The collapse of the Northern Bypass bridge in Karachi that killed nine people has brought into focus the issue of public accountability of military agencies involved in development projects in Pakistan.
Barely a month after it opened to traffic, the bridge, on the Pakistani Rs 350-crore (us $58 million) bypass, built by the military-owned National Logistic Cell (nlc) and the National Highway Authority (nha), collapsed on September 1, leaving officials scurrying for excuses. Strangely, the contract to build the bridge was awarded without bidding.
The Ministry of Communications had found flaws in the design of the bridge a year ago and recommended its reconstruction, says communications minister Shamim Siddiqui. But instead of rectifying the fault, nlc hired Belgian consultants on whose recommendations steel sheets were inserted in the bridge.Mohammad Noman, an associate professor at Karachi's ned University of Engineering and Technology, said, "In June 2006, while placing a pre-stress box girder it was noted that it remained above one of the pads. Specialists said the affected portion had to be dismantled. But strangely enough, nha did not force the contractor or the consultant to remove it."
"The cause of the collapse of the Northern Bypass flyover was a combination of flawed design and the absence of a regulatory structure to ensure that possible construction shortcomings are rectified without exposing the public to risk," says architect Arif Belgaumi.
Belgaumi points out that an effective regulatory agency is necessary to enforce standards of public safety. "In the absence of such agencies and with the involvement of autonomous military organizations, which perceive themselves to be above the law, the whole concept of public safety and welfare gets tossed aside," he says.
What complicates the matter is that there is no single administration in Karachi. Thirteen agencies, including cdgk, are involved in overseeing the affairs of the financial hub of Pakistan.
This highlights the growing influence of the armed forces in Pakistan's economy, or the "military capital". Military analyst Ayesha Siddiqa writes in her book Military Inc. Inside Pakistan's Military Economy "Today the Pakistan military's internal economy is extensive, and has turned the armed forces into one of the dominant economic players. The most noticeable and popular component of Milbus (Siddiqa's term for military capital) relates to the business ventures... ranging from smaller-scale ventures... to corporate enterprises such as commercial banks, insurance companies, radio and television channels, fertilizer, cement and cereal manufacturing plants, and insurance businesses."
"There is no doubt that the army is involved in these projects in a big way. It does not coordinate with city plans," said Arif Hasan, a leading architect and town planner. The flyover collapse should serve as an eye-opener.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.