The mystery of nerve cell behaviour could be solved with a recent study of how calcium affects cellular responses
SCIENTISTs at the MRc Laboratory of
Molecular Biology in Cambridge, UK,
claim to have unearthed a significant
relationship between calcium present
in our bodies and cellular responses.
Calcium plays an important role in
various physio -biological functions
ranging from normal development
to illness and cell death. Besides, the
calcium atom - more appropriately,
the calcium ion - is an important agent
of signalling between the cells of
our body or between the environment
and a cell. A whole range of external
signals first elicit a rise in the calcium
content of a cell; this rise tells the
cell what it has to do. The rise can be
caused by either an entry of calcium
from the outside or by a release of
the calcium that is stored in special
compartments inside the cell. Often,
an increase in cellular calcium is accompanied by an increase in the level of
calcium in the nucleus of the cell. It
had been believed that this was a passive
consequence of a leak from the main
body of the cell, the cytoplasm, into the nucleus.
The study - involving a combination of micro-injection and state-of- the-art fluorescence microscopy - by G E Hardingharn, Sangeeta Chawla and colleagues at MRC Laboratory has thrown this belief overboard. It has shown that calcium in the nucleus and calcium in the cytoplasm act as two different signals and control two different kinds of responses in the cell (Nature, Vol 385, No 6615).
The researchers injected a dye, BAPTA, into the nucleus of cells removed from the pituitary gland of a mouse. BAPTA binds calcium very tightly. When cells were stimulated after this procedure, the rise in cytoplasmic calcium was as expected but the rise in nuclear calcium was reduced by half It was seen that blocking the increase in nuclear calcium prevented the rise in activity of a particular gene that was normally evoked by the stimulus. However, not only did BAPTA affect the increase in cytoplasmic calcium caused by the stimulus, the expression of a second gene that was known to be activated thereby was also unaffected.
The finding essentially points out that when stimulated, a cell has some means of knowing whether it should respond by a decrease in the nuclear calcium pool, or by an increase in the cytoplasmic calcium pool. The two patterns of increase lead to correspondingly different patterns of gene activity.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.