Cell phone tower radiation a pollutant: MoEF panel

'Ecological impact assessment study should precede their installation'

 
By Savvy Soumya Misra
Last Updated: Saturday 04 July 2015

image

The writing on the wall is clear. The electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted by mobile phone towers are interfering with biological systems in more ways than one. It is affecting birds and bees, an indication that doesn't augur well for other species. What is also clear is that there aren't enough studies in India to show the impact of EMR on flora and fauna and that such studies are required.

These are the findings of a report on the possible impacts of communication towers on wildlife, released by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) in October.

The report has been prepared by an expert committee that was constituted on August 30, 2010, by the ministry in response to a question in the Lok Sabha on the ill-effects of mobile towers on birds. This report buttresses the finding of an inter-ministerial committee, comprising officials from the Department of Telecommunication, Indian Council for Medical Research, Department of Biotechnology and MoEF, that was released earlier this year. 

The committee that was supposed to review all the studies done so far, Indian and international, recommended that EMR should be treated as a pollutant and that more studies on humans and especially wildlife need to be carried out in India. The report suggests that studies on impact of cell phone towers and EMR on birds and other wildlife are almost non-existent in India.

The report concludes that EMR should be treated as a pollutant, especially as it is a potential cause for the decline of animal populations and deterioration of health of plants and humans living near radiation sources, such as phone masts. EMR is responsible not only for the declining number of birds, especially sparrows, but is also linked with an unusual phenomenon in bees known as ‘Colony Collapse Disorder’ when bees begin to vanish from their hives.

Literature review of studies done worldwide indicated a significant non-thermal, long-term impact of electro-magnetic fields (EMF) on species, especially at genetic level, which can lead to health complications including, brain tumors (glioma), reduction in sperm count and sperm mobility, congenital deformities, endocrine disruptions and psychiatric problems such as stress, ringxiety (phantom ringing), sleep disorders and memory loss.      

India needs to update standards

The report points out that since pollution from EMR is a relatively new environmental issue, there is a lack of established standard procedures and protocols to study and monitor electro-magnetic fields. In addition to the gap areas in research, the necessary regulatory policies and their implementation mechanism also have not kept pace with the growth of mobile telephone services.

The report states that the guidelines on exposure limits to EMFs need to be refined since the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standard, currently followed in India, is based on only thermal impact of radio frequency and is dismissive of current epidemiological evidence on impacts of non-thermal nature on chronic exposure from multiple towers.

The ICNIRP guidelines formulated in 1998, endorsed by WHO and EU then, had set a power density of 9.2 W/m2 (watt per square metre), but over the years countries have scaled down their power density substantially while India has chosen to stick to the guidelines. For instance, New Zealand follows an exposure limit of 0.5 W/m2, the exposure limit in Poland, Italy and Paris is 0.1 W/m2. Italy has a separate exposure limit of 0.025 W/m2 set for sensitive areas.

The executive committee was supposed to suggest possible mitigation measures and formulate guidelines for large-scale installation of mobile towers in the country.

Expert panel recommendations on cell phone towers

  • Indian standards on electromagnetic radiation (EMR) should match the best in the world
  • Ecological impact assessments be made mandatory for transmission towers and base stations, with standardized protocols and parameters
  • Public consultations should be made mandatory before installation of cell phone towers in any area
  • Forest department should be consulted before installation of cell phone towers in and around national parks, wildlife sanctuary, bird sanctuary and zoos
  • Information about the location of the mobile towers and other EMR along with their frequency towers should be put up in the public domain
  • If new towers must be built, their height should be between 80 feet (26.8 metre) and 199 feet (60.65 metre) to avoid the requirement for aviation safety lighting
  • To prevent overlapping high radiations fields, new towers should not be permitted within a radius of one kilometer of existing towers
  • Towers should be built on platforms so that in future the towers can be shifted from areas of high migratory bird traffic, wetlands and other known bird areas
 
The committee thus, recommends that precautionary principle should prevail and that Indian standards on EMR matches the best in the world. The expert committee also recommends that ecological impact assessments be made mandatory for transmission towers and base stations, with standardised protocols and parameters.

States' action
    
A couple of states like West Bengal and Delhi have in the past recommended similar guidelines for the installation of the mobile towers. In May this year, the Bombay High Court had asked the state health department and the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) to submit rules pertaining to the installation of mobile towers in the state. In June, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had ordered the government, to issue warnings of health hazards of mobile tower to the public.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Clearance from the so many

    Clearance from the so many government agencies doesn't reflect the unnecesary burden on the clearance-seeking companies. Moreover the majority of the mobile towers are installed in the densely populated areas because only the fetches them returns. These lot many clearences will only lead to more burden over the companies to seek the permission and in turn the cost burden over the people. Wll the authorities of the zoo and the forests know the details and the hazards of these and the their effects? What is actually required is framing proper guidelines for installation of cell phone towers, the bandwidth and the distance to be maintained from the fragile locations reqirements . These can be fruitful.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 8 years ago | Reply