States asked to bear 60 per cent cost
The Central Pollution Control Board is in talks with pollution control departments of eight states to begin remediation work at 12 sites which have been contaminated by highly toxic waste waste. The recently launched National Clean Energy Fund (NCEF) has approved Rs 60 crore for preparing detailed project reports for the sites. Activists say the exercise might turn out to be a theoretical one.
In August, the central board (CPCB) had proposed that 70 per cent of the project, costing Rs 805 crore, be borne by NCEF. But after discussions, it was decided NCEF would pay 40 per cent and the grant was cleared in principle if the state governments provide 60 per cent of the total cost; NCEF would provide the initial Rs 5 crores per site for the preparing detailed project reports.
On November 30, 2011, CPCB officials called a meeting with state representatives to discuss how they can fund the works. Vinod Babu, head of the hazardous waste division of CPCB says, public-private partnerships (PPPs) are the most preferred mode. Another method being explored is getting the polluter to clean the site based on the principle of 'polluter pays'.
The project currently is in the planning stage, says Aniruddhe Mukerjee, director with the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF). He is also in charge of the ongoing world bank project—capacity building for industrial pollution management—in Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal. The proposal for remediation of the selected dump sites under NCEF is broadly based on the world bank project.
States have committed themselves to preparing detailed project reports for six of the eight sites in collaboration with expert parties (see box). “These would be industry experts and consultants like Environmental Resource Management of Germany. They will suggest possible technology to be used and cost of the clean up,” says Babu of CPCB. He further explains that the selected company would have to provide three options of technology to be used along with cost of each, of which the state would pick one.
|Sites selected for remediation|
|State||Site||Nature of contaminant||Preliminary Details|
|Gujarat||Vadodara||Chromium||Approximately 77,000 tonnes of chromium residue is dumped in industrial plot. Groundwater is contaminated.|
|Kerala||Eloor, Cochin||Heavy metals and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)||24.5 hectares of soil and water bodies contaminated with pesticides and heavy metals in four locations|
|Madhya Pradesh||Ratlam||Gypsum, iron salts and Naphthalene||Severe contamination of groundwater with PAH and iron salts imparting red-colour|
|Orissa||Ganjam||Mercury||About 56,000 MT of sludge containing mercury dumped along and near the banks of Rishikulya|
|Orissa||Talcher||Chromium||60,000 tonnes of chromium leach residue is dumped in closed industry premises. Contamination of soil and surface water bodies during rains.|
|Orissa||Sundergarh||Chromium||Chromium leach residue dumps at 4 locations|
|Rajasthan||Bichhadi||Inorganic salts, organics||Contamination of soil and groundwater|
|Tamil Nadu||Ranipet||Chromium||Hexavalent Cr leaching from 7.41 acre dump site with 2.2 lakh MT of leach residue. Soil, ground wand surface water contamination|
|Uttar Pradesh||Rakhi-mandi, Kanpur||Chromium||Approximately 10,000 tonnes of residue dump in approximately 5 to 6 acres. People affected, groundwater contaminated.|
|Uttar Pradesh||Lucknow||HCH (Hexa-chloro cyclo-hexane)||Approximately 36,432 tonnes of pesticides waste dumped in closed industry premises|
|Uttar Pradesh||Rania, Kanpur Dehat||Chromium||Two square kilometres land area is contaminated with open dump of approximately 45,000 tonnes of waste|
|West Bengal||Nibra Village, Howrah||Chromium||About 4,440 tonnes of residue dumped, human settlement exists above the dump, contamination of groundwater.|
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.