Report: Face financial risk - Ignore climate change

A 2003 report, Carbon Finance and the Global Equity Markets, identifies changing climate due to rising global average temperature as one of the factors that will influence a company's competitiveness and profitability

 
Last Updated: Saturday 04 July 2015 | 02:50:09 AM

-- (Credit: EMKAY)Global warming is set to change the investment climate in the corporate world. A 2003 report, Carbon Finance and the Global Equity Markets, identifies changing climate due to rising global average temperature as one of the factors that will influence a company's competitiveness and profitability. Investors are beginning to revalue companies depending on their exposure to climate change risk, according to the report. Companies that heavily emit greenhouse gases (ghgs), or are most exposed to natural disasters, are at maximum risk of losing investor value.

Based on a survey of top 500 companies in the world (measured in terms of market capitalisation), the report was commissioned by 35 institutional investors including insurance companies and pension funds. It analyses growing pressures on companies to reduce ghg emissions and identifies risks -- on a sector-by-sector basis -- that investors should consider.

Industries with high emissions can suffer as much as 40 per cent in value. Those implementing policies to reduce risk arising due to climate change will have a competitive advantage, boosting their share prices. The report advises early action on averting climate change impacts. For example, rail firms are marketing their services on the strength of their low carbon emissions characteristics; companies like Unilever and Sainsbury have set emission reduction targets; the telecom sector is now pursuing teleconferencing as a way to reduce vehicle transport and emissions.

In the survey, more than 80 per cent of companies contacted recognise climate change as a serious issue. Some instances of financial risk are: the us semiconductor industry, from potential disruptions to crucial components from Taiwan (where weather induced water shortages are jeopardising chip manufacture); and business interruptions due to hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, that cause temporary but significant production losses for oil and gas production companies (see table: Most Impact).

Most Impact
Some sectors immediately affected by climate change*
Food Manufacturing and Retailing Losses to producers from drought; increased irrigation costs; greater risk of insect infestation and plant disease; decline in food production; increased food prices; opportunities for carbon sequestration in agricultural sector
Electric Utilities Higher maintenance costs; changing seasonal demand for electricity; more emphasis on renewable/clean power
Integrated Oil and Gas Business interruption due to storm activity, especially in the Gulf of Mexico; fossil fuel use decline in power production; opportunities in natural gas sector, and in sequestration
Paper and Forest Products Higher risk from fire; pest problems; Carbon sequestration opportunity in forestry and biomass-based power production 
Transportation Demand for coal transportation may decline; opportunities in clean fuel market and less GHG-intense transportation forms
Insurance and Reinsurance Business interruption becoming unpredictable; greater loss in case of calamities due to increase in population and infrastructure densities; enhanced risk to human health
*Increase in operating costs due to higher energy or fuel prices and risk due to GHG emissions regulations will have a bearing on almost every sector
The report dispels the notion that abiding by the Kyoto treaty could drive investment out of industrialised countries. On the contrary, if companies based in industrialised countries react too slowly to the treaty, it could make companies in developing countries -- such as posco, the Korean steel maker, and cemex, the Mexican cement manufacturer -- more cost competitive.

Notwithstanding the political process surrounding the Kyoto Protocol, regulations to restrict emissions and trading schemes are here to stay. For instance from 2005, European companies will have to pay 40 Euro per ton of carbon dioxide emitted until 2007 and a penalty of 100 Euro beginning 2008, if their ghg emissions exceed their allowance. Companies lagging behind in managing emissions could face significant penalties.
Intra-sectoral scare The report says that future threat to a company's value varies widely not only at sector level but also amongst different firms in the same sector. The reason is that companies and sectors differ in terms of their capabilities to manage risk. For instance, in case of electric utilities in the us, the estimated total cost of reducing ghg emissions intensity by 10 per cent range from over us $1.7 to below us $0.2 per megawatt hour.

With the emerging emissions trading market, the earlier a company secures emission reduction credits, the lesser it pays. According to the report such early movers are better positioned to adapt to unforeseen future developments, and exploit opportunities to make profits. Industry leaders are already investing in renewables and low carbon technologies. On the other hand, the slow movers will face legal liabilities in the form of lawsuits. Already precedents are being set by asbestos (see: 'Scurrying for cover', March 31, 2003) and tobacco litigation.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.