the first-ever debate on climate change in the un Security Council evinced strong protests
from developing nations. The proposal by the uk asked for a discussion on climate change in the council since it posed a
uk's foreign secretary Margaret Beckett, who chaired the 15-member body meeting on April 17, 2007, in New York,
argued that climate change had the potential to cause wars and the debate needs to move from the fringe to the Security Council, the most
powerful un body. "An unstable climate will exacerbate some of the core drivers of conflict--such as migratory
pressures and competition for resources," said Beckett.Drought and crop failure could intensify competition for food, water and energy while
economic destruction could be comparable to the World War ii or the great depression, she added.
Most industrial nations like the us, European countries and Japan supported the proposal. "The developing world, we
and others, must deal with the issue in a manner that it does not affect growth and development," said acting us
ambassador Alejandro Wolff. Japan's un Ambassador Kenzo Oshima also showed his support: "In the foreseeable future,
climate change may well create conditions or induce circumstances that could precipitate or aggravate international conflicts."
Peru, Panama and some Pacific Island states also supported the proposal. "The dangers that small island states and their populations face from
climate change are no less serious than those nations threatened by guns and bombs," said Robert Guba Aisi, ambassador, Papua New Guinea.
Italy endorsed un secretary-general Ban Ki-moon's proposal to create a new environmental organisation to co-ordinate
China out rightly opposed the proposal. "The Security Council has neither the professional competence in handling climate change nor is it the right
decision making body since it lacks extensive participation," said China's deputy ambassador Liu Zhenmin. Russia, Qatar, Indonesia and South Africa,
among others, also rejected the proposal claiming the council was not a place to take concrete actions. Most saw this as a ploy by developed
nations to eventually force developing nations to take up mandatory emission cuts.
Pakistan, as head of g-77 group that represents 132 developing nations including China, opposed uk's proposal saying that the debate encroached and compromised the mandate of more democratic bodies like the
192-member un General Assembly.
India opposed the proposal saying the only appropriate forum for discussing issues related to climate change was the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. India rejected it on technical grounds saying the catastrophic scenarios resulting from climate change have not been
calibrated with certainty. "The Stern report cites Richard Nordhaus extensively. Neither he not Stern have been able to overcome uncertainty and
the difficulty of calibrating catastrophic scenarios," said Nirupam Sen, India's permanent representative to the un
Security Council.Hence, the possible consequences of climate change in terms of border disputes, migration, energy supplies, societal stress and
the like could neither be specified nor be discussed in a meaningful manner, Sen added.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.