Study shows aid by BRICS 10 times higher than by developed countries
The BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa—have substantially increased funding to the poor countries to improve health.
Although the G7 donors (USA, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, UK and Japan) still provide far more assistance to poor countries, the foreign assistance by BRICS countries between 2005 and 2010 was 10 times higher than that of the G7, notes the report ‘Shifting Paradigm: How the BRICS are reshaping global health and development’ by Global Health Strategies Initiatives (GHSI), an international non-profit.
From 2005 to 2010, Russia’s assistance each year grew by 36.1 per cent, Brazil’s by 20.4 per cent, India’s by 10.8 per cent, China’s by 23.9 per cent and South Africa’s by eight per cent, the report states. On the other hand, the USA’s spending grew by 1.6 per cent, the UK’s by 3.7 per cent and Japan’s by 0.3 per cent.
Over this period, India’s total foreign assistance grew at an estimated 7.4 per cent annually between 2004 and 2010, from approximately US $443 million to US $680 million. It has given maximum foreign assistance for health improvement to Nepal and Bhutan. It has also helped Afghanistan and several African countries. India’s assistance to Afghanistan now is more than US $1 billion. Bulk of the assistance comes in the area of health infrastructure development.
The report notes that since BRICS are also developing countries and face health challenges of their own, thus their interests and goals in supporting global health and development efforts are tempered by domestic concerns.
“Though the BRICS countries have been giving foreign assistance for decades, their assistance has grown rapidly with their economies. Together these countries can have a major influence globally, especially in the field of health where most of these countries have common health issues of tuberculosis, HIV, non-communicable diseases and polio,” says David Gold, co-executive director, GHSI.
|Estimated absolute foreign assistance (2010)||US$472 m||US$400m-US$1.2b||US$680m||US$3.9b||US$143m|
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.