Is REC an albatross for power distribution utilities?

Only two states have achieved their renewable energy targets so far. Others scaled down their commitments

 
By Joel Kumar, Umashankar S
Last Updated: Thursday 17 September 2015 | 10:08:27 AM

Since the launch of the scheme last year, the government is buoyant on the renewable energy certificate (REC) market to increase the capacity of the sector. But given that the scheme is market-based, it hinges on the fragile commitments by states to meet their renewable energy purchase obligation (RPO) target. Their failure to source the committed amount of energy from renewable sources would mean REC mechanism would be just another all-bark-and-no-bite scheme of the government.

   Related Articles
 
 
While the first trading session in March this year showed some promise, with the trade of RECs hitting the ceiling price, the subsequent sessions cast doubts (see ‘Energy market glitch’, March 16-31, 2011). An official from the National Load Despatch Centre claims this fluctuation is likely because distribution companies, or discoms, feel they have a year to meet the RPO target. Nonetheless, project developers are upbeat and so far a substantive 597.4 MW is added under the REC mechanism.

What worries experts in the sector is the actual performance of states under the previous RPO regime under feed-in-tariff. As there was no financial liability imposed, only two states—Tamil Nadu and Karnataka—achieved their targets in 2009-10. With the launch of the REC market and consequent backdoor financial liability in case of default, many states scaled down their ambitions in 2010-11 to more realistic renewable energy additon goals.

As seen in the graphs, nine major states have sharply cut their obligations with the launch of REC mechanism. For example, Madhya Pradesh scaled down its RPO target by a staggering 92 per cent, Haryana by 85 per cent and Kerala by 40 per cent. The graph also shows that no scientific basis was applied for determination of earlier targets and the lack of seriousness by several states on meeting their obligation. Having revised their targets for 2010-11, an estimate on the current REC liability in monetary terms for non-solar projects is made with the government fixed floor price of Rs 1.5/kWh and ceiling price of Rs 3.9/kWh.

imageThe National Action Plan for Climate Change (NAPCC) of 2009 set state electricity targets through renewable energy sources. As per the targets 5 per cent of the total electricity generation should be sourced from renewable energy projects from 2010-11. It should be increased by one per cent every year till it reaches 15 per cent in 2020. But the achievement was just 3.9 per cent in 2009-10. Even after the revision of RPO targets came in, the pan-India RPO does not add up to 6 per cent envisaged in the NAPCC for the year 2010-11.

 
  2010-11 targets VS. 2009-10 achievement Non – Solar
State RPO (%)
Revised
Targets
(2010-
11)
% Achieved
In-
house
(2009-
10)*
Shortfall
(MU)
REC
Require-
ment
Minimum
Cost 
INR Millions
(floor price)
Maximum
Cost INR
Millions
(forbea-
rance
price)
Haryana 1.50% 0.01% 487 487528 731.29 1901
Punjab 4.00% 1.49% 1051 1051816 1577.72 4102
Rajasthan 8.50% 3.23% 2379 2379352 3569.03 9279
Uttar Pradesh 4.00% 2.97% 670 670973 1006.46 2617
Uttarakhand 4.00% 2.18% 168 168605 252.91 658
Chhattisgarh 5.00% 3.62% 140 140401 210.60 548
Gujarat 5.00% 2.55% 1654 1654853 2482.28 6454
Madhya Pradesh 0.80% 0.06% 285 285855 428.78 1115
Maharashtra 6.00% 4.25% 1872 1872308 2808.46 7302
Andhra Pradesh 5.00% 4.06% 718 718903 1078.35 2804
Karnataka 10.00% 11.04% -484 -484921 -727.38 -1891
Kerala 3.00% 0.51% 442 442324 663.49 1725
Tamil Nadu 14.00% 13.79% 157 157546 236.32 614
Orissa 4.50% 1.59% 650 650734 976.10 2538
West Bengal 2.00% 0.34% 596 596040 894.06 2325
Total :     10792.31 10792314 16188.47 42090.03
*State performances for the year 2010-11 are not available yet. Hence previous year's share is assumed for 2010-11 as well.
Source: CSE computation from state regulatory commission orders
 

The above table shows that about 10 million renewable energy certificates (RECs) are required for states to comply with their targets for 2010-11. This would be valued at Rs 1,618 crore at floor price and Rs 4,209 crore at the ceiling prices. Given the financial losses of discoms of the entire country at Rs 7,887 crore in 2007-08 (source: Deo Pramod et al, 2010) which continues to rise, the new added liability from REC is possibly going to be an albatross looming over them.

As the financial liability for discoms increases by a significant 20 per cent at a minimum due to the REC scheme, any lifelines by electricity regulators to discoms in the form of carry forward or further reduction in RPOs targets would severely hurt the investor confidence and consequently affect renewable energy uptake. In view of the above, Central and state governments need to be urged to uphold the policy stability under REC. The government first needs to make the non-compliance of RPOs strict. How the discoms will be able to pay off such huge amount still remains ambiguous.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Good to see quantitative

    Good to see quantitative analysis of the issue.

    The issue is going to be downward revision in the RPO by *key* states such TN.

    The capacity will be left without demand from the regulations/compliance market, leading to drop in prices. The compliance aspect must remain and be enforced to ensure attractiveness of REC market.



    - Kedar

    Posted by: Anonymous | 8 years ago | Reply
  • I attended a workshop that

    I attended a workshop that was organized in June 2011 on the REC mechanism by National Load Despatch Centre. The mood amongst people attending the workshop was not one of excitement or high anticipation - rather, the mood was very dull and dreary, and as discussions went on, the feeling was that this is certainly not worth the time and effort being put in, and it is going to be another white elephant. A lot of the power producers present actually pointed out that not only was the forbearance price of no use to these people, there was actually no demand of these certificates, the state agencies were not willing to adopt CERC norms. Moreover, as there is no secondary trading, the prices would be worthless. Moreover, I also pointed out that the price should be raised with a percentage of these revenue churns to fund R&D in renewable energy in India that helps to make it cheaper, something not thought about at all.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 8 years ago | Reply
  • Thanks Kedar and Rohit for

    Thanks Kedar and Rohit for the views. At some point during later this fiscal year, we perhaps will get a feel of how the situation may evolve. Meanwhile, all eyes on CERC's proposal to review (i.e. cut) the floor and ceiling prices.

    Posted by: Umashankar S | 2 years ago | Reply