10,000+ south Bengal fisherfolk, in a net not of their making
It is October, 2004. In the Supreme Court (sc) in Delhi, there continues a 2-year-old case that has become a clash of imperatives: protecting the environment -- a fragile mangrove ecology -- versus people's livelihood: a sustainable style of fishing. But let us turn away from the hectic atmosphere of a court hearing. Let us go to the delta that lies at the fag-end of the Gangetic Plain, off West Bengal.
Here the brute solidity of the subcontinent's landmass gives way to water, uneasily. Here, pockets of land mulishly poke out of an immense expanse of water: the landmass refuses to give way, and the Bay of Bengal refuses to let go. In this region that is water but also land, October signifies the beginning of a four-month fishing season. And here, this year, more than 10,000 jaila kaibartyas -- a south Bengal caste of traditional fisherfolk -- wait with hardly concealed desperation to set out to sea. But they won't.
The problem is fisherfolk use a part of Jambudwip to dry the fish they catch 15 km south, in the sea. What, now, is the point of fishing if the fish can't be dried there?
This is where complications occur. Jambudwip was declared a reserved forest as long ago as 1943. Yet, older fisherfolk remember the island being used to dry fish since the 1950s. A seminal 1967 field study by anthropologist Bikash Raychaudhary -- published as The Moon and the Net by the Anthropological Survey of India -- also testifies to a time-honoured activity. Indeed, fish-drying on Jambudwip continued even after the 1980 act was promulgated. As Kiranmoy Nanda, West Bengal's fisheries minister, maintains, "All along, these fishermen were given seasonal permits by the forest department." Nanda adds, "The Wildlife Protection Act and the Coastal Regulation Zone under the Environment Protection Act protect the customary rights of fishermen". This statement further complicates the picture: Jambudwip is an uninhabitated island; arguably, therefore, people have no rights here.
Each net is 60-70 feet wide, fixed with bamboo poles rammed into the sea-bottom, facing the tide. The nets are placed where underwater creeks exist, where deltaic rivers deposit nutrients, thus attracting fish. Such a demand turns buhundi placement into an art, fine-tuned through years of keen observation and practice. Unlike unsustainable fishing practices that indiscriminately swathe through the seabed -- gill nets, typically what trawlers use -- transient fishing uses stationary nets. But here, boats are used only to reach the place, fix nets and haul the catch.
The catch has to be hauled, then nets turned to face the turning tide, in about 7 minutes. A tide pulls the net to the bottom; the fish follow the flow, and so get caught. For a few minutes before the tide turns, the net surfaces. Now the catch must be unloaded into the boat; then quickly, the mouth is reversed. Work stops on full moon and moonless days; on these days the tide is too strong, the net doesn't hold. For 120 days in 5 months, the fisherfolk work the creeks. An entire team stays at sea.
What they catch is sent, in a round-the-clock operation, to Jambudwip.
In Jambudwip, in a parallel operation, fish unloaded from boats are dried and sent to the mainland. Since the interim order, there has much talk of an alternative site. But fisherfolk assert this island's unique: it is the only one between the fishing area and the mainland that has a natural creek navigable during high tides, which fisherfolk use to unload their catch. Also, only Jambudwip has a flat land without sand, ideal for drying fish. Kiran Das, a fisherman, pointed out the need for a place such as Jambudwip: "The fish has to be put to drying before they start rotting and smelling. If we have to transport the raw fish over longer distances, refrigeration will increase our cost." The distance, 15-20 km, is covered using a 30-45 horsepower boat in 3-4 hours.
Fisherfolk involved in drying stay in Jambudwip in makeshift shelters. Fish are strung on bamboo bars, or laid on a bed prepared with a thick layer of straw and mosquito nets on top. The straw helps air flow under the fish.
The fisherfolk use the dry winter north breeze -- and plenty of sunshine -- to quick-dry fish naturally. This is probably why the season ends by February: after that, the southern wind is moist. "It is not a wonder why Jambudwip dryfish attracts the best price in the market", explains Nanda.
Jambudwip is also the only island that, natural creek apart, has a forest where fisherfolk can shelter during cyclones or rough weather.
Over time, transient fishing has become capital intensive. In all, at least 10,000 people get directly employed -- in fishing, drying and net-making -- and another 7,000 in the backward supply chain of implements and the forward chain of transport and fishmeal processing in piggeries and poultries. Interestingly, local 'traders' who control the operation are part of the fishing community. They are called ' bahardars' (roughly, 'master of the fleet'). All bahardars were once fishermen; all fishermen aspire to be a bahardar. Fishermen work for a bahardar for a salary of Rs 6,000 to Rs 20,000 for the season (the range is related to skill), 60 per cent of this salary is paid before the fisherfolk set out to sea. A typical bahradar owns at least 25 nets, each costing Rs 20,000. He employs at least 150 people -- 100 for fishing and another 50 for drying -- and has to provide food, shelter or medicines.
A 25-net operation requires at least 5 small boats (called 'phatphati', a boat powered by a 3- 5 hp diesel motor) and 2 large boats (powered by 30-45 hp engines; the engines are only for propulsion, its power depends on how far into the sea it travels). Bahardars either own these boats, or hire them in a season.
Says bahardar Sukhlal Das, "The total Rs 40 lakh that has to be invested for a season looks very large. But we live on rolling credit. I can start my operation with Rs 7-8 lakh. The point still remains that I'm responsible for all the people I employ, irrespective of what I make." In fact, a bahardar usually borrows money. "And like most other business in India, the wholesale buyer in Kolkata or Sheoraphuli is the moneylender," explains Harekrishna Debnath, chairperson, National Fishworkers' Forum. "He enjoys the guarantee of getting the product from the borrower at a lower rate than the market value".
It isn't surprising moneylenders run the show: institutional loans for fishing all over India are weak; insuring a boat commands a very high premium. Most bahardars are absolutely clear it is better to borrow from a moneylender -- with whom they have business relations -- than to have a fixed deposit, or mortgage property with a bank for a loan.
But in the last two years, this rolling credit economy has badly floundered. Wholesale buyers, who would flock to the area September-onwards, have stopped coming. Supply is now beginning to trickle in from Andhra Pradesh and Orissa. And consumers from as far as the northeast, where dry fish is a delicacy and a staple source of protein, have begun complaining of poor quality.
The West Bengal forest ministry has touted the idea of using Haribhanga, a sand bar in the mouth of river Hooghly -- also known as Lower Long Sand -- as the alternative site for fish drying. But, as the chief secretary pointed out in an affidavit to the sc, Haribhanga has certain basic problems. It has no creek or shallow; so boats cannot dock and unload catch. Moreover, it is a bald patch of sand flats and dunes. It is difficult to access Haribhanga: this correspondent had to change to a smaller boat mid-sea and wade through chest-deep water. Lack of vegetation makes it useless to shelter in Haribhanga during a cyclone. Gunodhar Das, a bahardar who has become a pauper today, used to be a labourer in the 1970s; a cyclone devastated Haribhanga, and Das survived after floating for 3 days up to the Andhra coast. Now, with no work, he has turned labourer again.
Nevertheless, some operators are using Haribhanga, a clear sign of desperation. The situation is fraught: every new place fishermen try out puts them at loggerheads with locals, for most places they go to are populated, and locals resent their intrusion: fish-drying requires huge, open land. But such spaces are simply not available.
The question is: what will happen to the mangrove forests on the 1950-hectare Jambudwip island if the fisherfolk go back there? cec's worry is the fragile mangrove ecology will get decimated. In court, it has shown satellite maps indicating a large part of the mangrove has been destroyed 1980s onwards. But the fact still remains that these fishermen have been using the island since the 1950s. Satellite imagery shows approximately 200 hectares have been destroyed. Point is: did the fisherfolk do that? Says Nanda, "No fishermen in the sea, with any sense, will destroy tree cover -- their only shelter. In fact, the mangrove will stay if they are there, for fishermen know that the mangrove is where fish breed."
Should it not be taken into account that, after 50 years of operation, a mere 200 hectares out of the total 1950 hectares have been felled? What about the felling that occurred in the last two years, since the fishing stopped? Says Tarini Bhattacharya, wife of the priest of the temple in Jambudwip, "Trees are being felled, but I cannot risk my life by telling you who has done it. I stay here alone with my husband." Reports last month in a Bengali daily talk of illegal felling in the island. Further, the forest department, which wishes to protect the mangroves, have strangely enough been planting casaurina on the island.
"I am sure fishermen will not indulge in destroying the mangrove, but if the place is open to them, it may attract other people who may destroy," says Ashok Gupta, chief secretary, West Bengal. This is a real fear: although the images cec showed in court do not indicate clear-felling, their worry on this count isn't misplaced, and calls for strict monitoring. In their affidavit, West Bengal has proposed diverting 100 hectares of forest land in Jambudwip for fish-drying, an area that will be fenced and monitored. To compensate, the government will go for plantation over 100 hectares in Bhangonkhali in the Sunderban area.
This proposal of the West Bengal government is now with the Union ministry of environment and forests, awaiting clearance. And the fisherfolk will now have to wait until the first week of November, 2004, when the ministry will inform sc about its decision. Will this case show that environmental protection, and the imperative of people's livelihoods, go hand in hand?
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.