The North and South disagree on classifying logged timber.
AT THE November meeting of the
International Tropical Timber
Organisation'(ITTO), some industrialised countries proposed
labelling imported timber according to region of origin and whether
it came from a "sustainably logged"
forest. Timber from "unsustainably
logged" forests would be banned by
the consumer countries.
The proposal was not accepted because of fears that if forests no longer provided an, economic incentive for timber-producing countries, they would be cleared for other economic purposes. There was no consensus also on the I'sustainability" of commercial logging, which is to be reached by 2000.
However, Austria has unilaterally made labelling of tropical timber mandatory, rousing Malaysia's ire. The Austrian move was partly due to anticipation that failure to achieve selective bans will lead environmental NGOs to lobby for a total consumer boycott of tropical timber.
A motion was made to include temperate forests in ITTO's purview, but this was not acceptable to the North, which did not want its forests to be monitored by the international community. However, the meeting achieved little in fulfilling ITTO's main goals. According to an NGO statement issued on the last day, "Again, the meeting has been dominated by tortuous debate on project proposals, far.from adjusting the balance of ITTO's activities towards muchneeded policy discussion."
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.