Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder By Richard Louv Algongquin Books New York 2005
Much of human history has been a slow but determined movement away from wild areas. But it hasn't been until very recently that urban living has been the norm rather than the exception. Though urban numbers are much higher in many western countries, the mass exodus out of rural areas in roaring economies such as India and China is also well-documented. 80 per cent of the us population now lives in metropolitan areas. In comparison about 30 per cent of the Indian population lives in urban centres, but let's not forget that's a rising trend .
The un now predicts that by 2030, 60 per cent of the world's population will live in urban and suburban areas. The ramifications of such a paradigm shift are quite significant. Discussions on such a shift generally focus on issues such as food production, spiking population densities and waste-management infrastructure. This book under review points to a unique aspect of this shift: what do we know of how an existence deprived of natural spaces impacts kids?
In Last child in the woods, us -based child- expert Richard Louv points out that today's children are probably the first generation growing up with little to no direct experience with nature. "I like to play indoors because that's where all the outlets are," explains one of his hundreds of young interviewees. Louv proposes the term "nature-deficit disorder" to analyse the little studied phenomenon.
However, Louv's emphasis on the recent disappearance of what he calls children's "exploratory freedom" is worth examining. He links this to current near-epidemics of childhood obesity, depression and attention-deficit disorder (add). "Studies have repeatedly shown that simply spending time in nature can even preclude the need for pharmacological or behavioural therapies," notes Louv. But this is a solution that leads to another question: why has this link between the lack of open spaces and ailments such as add remained unexplored in the first place?
There is a critical corollary to such thinking. A huge emphasis of the environment movement, has, over the past several decades, been on legal and political processes -- on the adult world. Louv notes that the movement has targeted kids in only one way: opening the eyes of students to a few environmental problems. The author does not discount the important of such an approach. He, however, argues that the method is likely to prove futile if it's not accompanied with similar approaches to open children's eyes to the calm and beauty and magic of natural, unkempt land. "Teach a classroom to associate the environment only with problems and that's just what children will learn," says Louv.
Further, a 2002 report funded by the us government produced "stunning" findings: "Environment-based education -- that had students out of the classroom -- improves student performance in a broad range of courses, including raising the much-hyped standardised test scores". "Attachment to nature is not only good for the child, but for the land as well,." Louv concludes. One only wishes he had not conflated nature with the "pristine, wild".
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.