You may freshen up your breath, but cops will soon be equipped with a microphone that can catch you by your voice pattern
CATCHING sloshed people on the roads has always been tricky for the police. Mild drinkers are often experts at pretending that they are sober. But the next time you get caught for driving in an
inebriated state, the cops may simply
ask you to speak in a microphone linked
to a computer, which can easily provide
conclusive proof of your crime (The
Economist, Vol339, No 7969).
An American scientist, Kathleen Cummings from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, us, is developing a new technology that can elicit patterns from drunken speech that a computer can analyse. In a related work, researchers Renetta tull and Janet Rutledge from the Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, are examining what having a cold can do to your voiceprint -their efforts aim towards discovering the gadgets that a computer would need to separate one person's voice from another's.
A lot of research in speech recognition is already underway. It basically means picking out the voiceprint -the elements that make a voice unique and hence recogniseable. It also enables recognition of a person's voice with a bunged-up nose or alcohol-sodden consonants.
The human voice, as we hear it, is born in the vocal cords, and is then modified and articulated in the vocal tract ~ the throat, mouth and lips. For a computer to recognise a human voice, it needs to <;onvert the="" sound="" into="" mathematical="" formulae.="" there="" are="" several="" ways="" of="" doing="" it,="" each="" highlighting="" different="" aspects="" of="" the="" voice.="" the="" first="" is="" the="" raw="" sound="" -the="" waveform.="">;onvert>
To unpack this waveform, Cummings passed a speech recording backwards through a series of filters that mimic the vocal tract, returning it as closely as possible to the pristine glottal sound. She found that a drunken person not only walks unsteadily but also has wavering vocal cords - this enables a reliable computer test for intoxicated speech. Similarly, Tull and Rutledge put snuffy and normal voice recordings through another filter - one that simulates how human hearing systems process sound. They found that healthy and unhealthy voices contained different features which could be measured by a computer.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.