No more freebies to doctors: GSK

Pharma company changes marketing strategy to put an end to malpractices

 
By Kundan Pandey
Last Updated: Monday 17 August 2015

GSK was under fire in China in July last year where it was accused of bribery

UK-BASED pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) announced significant changes in its marketing practices on December 17. The company declared that it will not pay doctors to promote its medicines and end the practice of giving prescription targets to its medical representatives. The decision comes at a time when the pharma industry in India is demanding legalisation of such practices.

GSK said it will also stop providing financial support to healthcare professionals to attend medical conferences and will, instead, fund their education through independent educational grants. In the statement issued to media, the company said that “the new compensation system” will begin by early 2015 in allÔÇêcountries where it operates.

GSK was under fire in China in July last year where it was accused of bribery. GSK allegedly paid US $5 millions to travel agencies to arrangeÔÇêtours for doctors. The pharma company, however, denies that the change in its marketing practices is related to the China case. GSK says that the policy change is the result of a pilot programme introduced in the US in 2011 where it proved successful.

Pilot programme

The pilot programme, named Patient First, introduced in the US bases compensation for medical representatives on qualitative measures and the overall performance of their business, rather than the number of prescriptions generated. The US passed the Sunshine Act in 2013 which requires pharma companies to give details of the money and gifts paid to doctors. France enacted a similar law in mid 2013.

India relies on Medical Council of India (MCI) to prevent malpractices. An MCI notification on December 10, 2009, prohibits all healthcare professionals in India from accepting benefits from pharmaceutical or allied healthcare companies for any purpose, including educational programmes.

The notification also prohibits sponsorships even if the event is organised by independent third party organisations.

Seeking a relaxation from the notification, the department of pharmaceutical, Ministry of Chemical and Fertilisers, sent a letter to the Ministry of Family and Welfare aÔÇêyear ago, saying continued medical education is essential for professional growth and will eventually benefit patients. The ministry has not responded yet.

K V Babu, a doctor who accessed the pharmaceutical department’s letter through a Right To Information application, points out that the letter was sentÔÇêat the behest of the pharma industry and doctors did not have any problem with the MCI notification. Arun Gupta, convener of Delhi-based non-profit Alliance Against Conflict of Interest, says despite MCI’s decision, companies are still engaged in malpractices. He says Johnson and Johnson in its annual report for 2012 revealed having paid more than Rs 1 crore in 2011-12 to Indian Academy of Pediatrics.

Industry view

President of Indian Pharmaceutical Congress Association and deputy drug controller Atul Kumar Nasa has commended GSK. He says practices like paying doctors to boost sales create a negative image of the industry and GSK’s decision may force others to fall in line.

Chairperson-cum-managing director of Mankind Pharma Ltd R C Juneja says if companies stop paying doctors, drugs will be sold only on the basis of their efficacy and expenses of companies willÔÇêreduce.ÔÇêP P Sharma, vice-president of Pharmacy Council of India, has a similar view. He says companies can cut cost by restricting unwarranted expenditure and this would benefit patients.

ButÔÇêcases of doctors getting freebies from companies have been reported many times. A letter by Lok Sabha MP Jyoti MirdhaÔÇêto the prime minister in 2012 cites an instance where 15 doctors from Madhya Pradesh flew to England and Scotland allegedly at the expense of Ahmedabad-based pharma company Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Gupta says that though the GSK announcement is a good development, there is no one to check if the company implements it strictly. Instead of waiting for companies to make such announcements, Gupta says the government must come up with strict laws.


Conflict of interest reporting by authors involved in promotion of off-label drug use: An analysis of journal disclosures

Take a stand

A stinging indictment of India's drug regulation authority

Doctors and drug companies: Still cozy after all these years

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories
Related Blogs

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • There is no platform created either by the Government or by the Pharmaceutical industry to educate the medical fraternity to update knowledge on the umpteen number of drugs that are being brought in to the market. This being the case small pharma companies who cannot afford advertisements through media owing to the its prohibitive costs. The restrictions imposed by the IMC by amending the code of ethics and conduct probably has done more damage to the pharmaceutical industry and the general public than achieving the intended goal. What is more dangerous to the society is the unethical practice following by the medical fraternity in collusion with the Super Special Hospitals and the Pharma Companies in imposing and administering so called life saving drugs by compulsion at unduly exorbitant cost when the patients are on death bead and the care takers have no other option and this is done for sumptuous consideration received both by the Doctors and the Hospitals.
    What the IMC and the Government should target is such Doctors, Hospitals and the Pharma Companies and not those who manufacture and sell low cost generic medicines.
    It is interesting to note that the IMC has filed an affidavit before the Hon'ble High Court of New Delhi wherein it has declared on oath that the jurisdiction of IMC is limited to Doctors and has no jurisdiction over the Hospitals. If it is is it OK for the unethical pharma companies to give suck kick backs and huge amounts in cash or kind by rewards to the Hospitals and they are not hit by the IMC Regulations.
    It is said in Kannada "HANNU THINDAVANU THAPPISIKONDA AND SIPPE HIDAKONDAVANU SIKKIHAKIKONDA" meaning the "the One who ate the fruit escapes and the one who holds the outer shell or skin of the fruit gets caught."

    This is life.
    K.Y.Ningoji Rao

    Posted by: Ningoji Rao Kolekar | 3 years ago | Reply