Fifty years after Hiroshima, the
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
is now hearing arguments on
whether there can be a circumstance in which any country can
legitimately be allowed to use a
nuclear weapon against another.
The arguments have been polarised
between the nuclear haves and
have-nots. And as with any other
precious thing, the haves are refusing to let go.
This is an unusual case, in fact. Some feel it is a purely theoretical exercise. Others hold that this concerns the future of humanity. But more than anything else, the case is unusual because it has not been brought about by feuding governments, but through the action of private citizens.
Nearlya decade ago, a group of lawyers opposed to nukes decided to organise sympathetic governments into a coalition at the UN General Assembly and the World Health Organization (WHO). Aided by scientists and pressure groups, they managed to persuade majorities in both the bodies to request the ICJ to adjudicate on this. And though the decision will not be legally binding, it could in future form the basis for action by the General Assembly and the WHO. America and Britain stead- fastly maintained that nukes could be used legitimately, and the British Attorney General reminded the Courfof"the sombre but vital role played...in support of international security over the last 50 years." He held that it could be used for the "conquest...of the most brutal and enslaving character". But, says Peter Weiss, an antinukes lawyer from New York, "Its a win-win situation." If ICJ says nukes are legal, there'd be tremendous pressure from non-nuclear states for a convention banning them. And "if the court says the weapons are illegal, many states will ignore the ruling, which could lead to perhaps an even greater effort to force the adoption of a convention." The hearings are on.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.