the International Court of Justice in The Hague has delivered its profoundest judgement yet: nuclear arms should not be used in war. However, it was unable to make up its mind on whether the restriction included the usage of such arms as a means of self-defence. Eleven days of hearing and testimony from 25 countries later, the 14-judge court delivered the judgement on the issue raised by two un bodies, the World Health Organization (who) and the United Nations General Assembly on July 8.
The decision came as a fillip to the anti-nuclear lobby which hoped the court judgement would serve as a beginning for a worldwide campaign to ban nuclear usage. The who was also asked to limit its attention to issues of public health and not international law as they "lay outside who's scope of activities".
The only factor of consequence arose when the court refused to accept arguments in favour of nuclear weapons proposed by the nuclear-haves, that the presence of the bomb acted as a nuclear deterrent and had brought peace to western Europe.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.