Replicate white elephants?
Recently in a national daily, U R Rao, former chairperson of
Indian Space Research Organisation
(isRo), was reported to have
suggested that organisational
structures "successfully working"
in the space and atomic energy
sectors be "replicated" in other areas
such as civil aviation for "greater
productivity". Rao said that the country
never faced the problem of finding
money for good projects.
The high-flying science babus
are indeed capable of burning away
monstrous sums of money. Rao
may wish the common people to
believe that they are able to afford
telecom links and see quality
telecasts due to 'achievements'
of ism but there is a limit to which
people can be fooled.
The defense research pundits
may flaunt their breakthroughs in
having come out with technology
demonstrators with (almost) total
indigenous efforts, but at what cost
and to whom? About the organisational
structures in the department of
atomic energy, which can only
show an installed power generation
capacity of 1,100 mw after gobbling
up 20 per cent of the science and
technology budget after 30 years, the
less said the better.
Does Rao want the 'other areas'
oo to be put behind a thick veil of
secrecy to function sad competition
'to 'show' successful 4rking? Does he
want the people to tighten their
belts a littf ore and be 'proud
of the achievements' of the aviation
babus also?
Top frontier science experts
researching in the'atomic energy,
space and defense sectors appropriate
what should legitmately go to
'humble' scientists working in
areas like agriculture, sustainable
farrhing, nature conservation, public
health and hygiene, veterinary
and dairy sciences, and water
management.
R A Mashelkar, director general of
toe Council for Scientific and Industrial
Ifesearch (CSIR) @ecently waxed
eloquent about the 'most pro-science
budget' whiA allocated a princely
sum of Rs 50 crore to modernise
CSIR'S primitive laboratories. The
bureaucrat may not be unaware that
the allocation to the science white
elephant in the budget is a whopping
Rs 4,687 crore.
If the country is to make any
headway in science that is useful to
those who pay through their noses, the
white elephants need to be slaughtered
forthwith, not replicated.
...
Running backward
It was heartening to be a part of the
recently launched Campaign Against
Air Pollution by the Centre for Science
and Environment. You have been
bringing to focus the extremely
alarming situation and the equally
extreme callousness of the powers
that be.
Several years ago, Indian petrol
pumps used to give only low-octane
petrol, as the car engines were of
comparatively low compression. In the
'80s, introduction of 'modern' cars and
bikes having higher compression
engines needing petrol with a higher
octane value caused an increase in lead
emissions, and we are now trying to go
to 'more modern' cars running on
lead-free (low-octane) petrol. Either
way, a nice fat income for car/bike
makers.
The harmful effect of lead on our
brains was known before we went in for
increased lead in our petrol to bring in
imported 'modern' technology.
Nevertheless, our policy makers went
ahead with this.
Even though well tested four-stroke
engine technology is commercially
available, almost all the 'modern'
two-wheeler technology we imported
from 'advanced' countries are of the
highly polluting two-stroke variety. The
cost difference between the two is very
small but to our policy makers, this
cost must have appeared bigger than
the cost in terms of the health effect
from lead in petrol.
And in their wisdom our policy
makers also abolished the lower rate of
excise duty on fuel efficient vehicles a
few years ago, removing the incentive
to make less polluting vehicles. Having
big swanky fuel guzzling cars at a
marginally lower cost was so much
more important.
Let me ask here, who really
makes policies - industry, politicians
or bureaucrats? And for what
consideration?
...
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.