the furore triggered by the international animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals ( peta ) over Indian leather has taken a serious turn with concerned authorities in India questioning the organisation's motives.
Meanwhile, peta has persuaded five more firms to ban goods and accessories made of India leather. The latest to join the protest is the us clothing companies Liz ClaiborneInc and J Crew Group Inc, British shoemaker C&J Clark Limited and men's footwear manufacturers Fiorucci and Florsheim.
Urging peta not to misinform the world about the origins of Indian leather, director of the Centre for Technology Development ( ctd ) D Raghunandan said that for the past two decades his group was involved in revitalising the leather tanning business by rural artisans and that the leather used was taken from animals who had died a natural death.
A statement by the ctd pointed out: "They ( peta) have been motivated not just by their passions compounded by monumental ignorance but by other considerations, such as the interests of some western industries and multi-national companies to throttle a major Indian export."
The Indian Council for Leather Exports had also earlier passed a clarification stating that animals were primarily slaughtered for meat, a claim that has been swiftly refuted by peta .
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
.png)
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.