Insurance companies should be allocated districts for minimum three years, instead of one season, to remove uncertainties, says panel headed by P K Mishra
The committee set up by the Central government to review the implementation of crop insurance schemes in India has recommended introduction of an agriculture insurance Act to take care of specific requirements of the crop insurance and agriculture insurance in general.
The four-member committee, appointed in September 2013, was headed by former agriculture secretary, P K Mishra, and submitted its report in May this year.
General insurance v crop insurance
The report says crop insurance is different from general insurance in many ways and does not strictly follow rules and regulations of general insurance, such as receipt of insurance premiums and claim intimation by the insured. But the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has placed crop insurance under the miscellaneous category of the general insurance business. In the absence of appropriate law, various provisions such as compulsory coverage of loan availing farmers being challenged in courts. Therefore, it would be appropriate to have an agriculture insurance Act, says the committee.
The committee was formed to examine the loopholes, in any, in the implementation of existing crop insurance schemes—the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS), Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (MNAIS) and Weather-Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS)—and suggest measures for plugging them. The panel members comprised Raj Kumar and D B Gupta, principal secretaries for agriculture in Gujarat and Rajasthan respectively, and P J Joseph, chairperson-cum-managing director of Agriculture Insurance Company of India Limited. They were asked to submit their report within six months.
The committee has pointed out that under the present crop insurance system, districts are allocated through bids to insurance companies every season, creating uncertainty among insurers willing to invest in insurance education and awareness. Even those insurers who pay a large amount of claims in a particular season may not reap goodwill in the next season when they are allocated another district. The committee has, therefore, recommended that districts/crops be allocated to an insurer (the insurance company) for a minimum of three years.
The report says that a web portal along the lines of the one in Gujarat should be developed by the National Informatics Centre (NIC) for other states so as to make data about land records available to financial institutions. The web portal would enable financial institutions to link each farmer’s existing loan account to the unique land account, making it possible to detect multiple loans taken against the same land.
The committee says that state governments should ensure the use of GPRS-enabled, camera-fitted mobile phones or hand-held machines while conducting crop cutting experiments (to determine average yield in a district), so as to transmit data on a real-time basis. The applications developed in Gujarat and also by the pilot studies under the World Bank technical assistance in Maharashtra and Rajasthan, can be utilised to put in place appropriate systems in other states, the report says.
The committee claims that implementation of recommendations in a time-bound manner, with some prioritisation, would help to plug the loopholes, thereby, effectively addressing the issues involved.
|Other key recommendations
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.