the department of biotechnology (dbt) under the Union ministry of science and technology and earth science claims they are supporting coordinated research projects on development of plant-based pesticides. According to Kapil Sibal, the minister concerned, the aim is to bring out cost-effective and commercially viable formulations for use under integrated pest management (ipm).
But the fact is there has been very little contribution by the ministry in the last two decades. At present, the only plant-based pesticides available in the country are derived from Azadirachta indica (neem). There are possibilities beyond neem and experts feel that the basic thought behind the research on botanicals by dbt is faulty and does not take into account India's strength -- traditional knowledge.
The minister revealed that a total of 694 samples from 61 species have been screened against eight test insects (pathogens). Six plants were found effective against diamond back moth, aphids, tobacco caterpillar, cabbage semilooper, mosquitoes and the red spider mite. Four most effective species were identified and a total of 55 formulations were prepared. Three formulations have, so far, demonstrated positive activity against diamond back moth, aphids and mosquitoes. These formulations will now be taken up for limited scale field trials for further evaluation.
Despite such efforts, products have not been developed and most of the work is still limited to only screening of different plants. For example, as the latest (2005-2006) annual report of dbt reveals, the Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, has evaluated indigenous plants against pests of tea and found that root extract of Linostoma decundrum and leaf extract of Clerodendron inerme were effective against red spider mite. spic Science Foundation, a Chennai-based ngo, had earlier isolated clerodin from another species of Clerodendron (C. infortunatum) in 2003-2004 funded by dbt . The problem is work on two different species under the same genus is being taken up by different organisations. But Seema Wahab, the scientist at dbt who is in charge of the projects, says the screening process is important and takes a long time.
There is another school of thought that suggests traditional knowledge should be modified to an extent to make commercially viable products. In Ahmedabad, the Sadhbhav sristi Sansodhan Laboratory has created a database of farmers' knowledge on botanicals. Using this information, the laboratory has conducted experiments on a large number of grassroots practices and herbal formulations reported by the innovators. Use of Lantana camara extract to control cotton pests is a good example. The organisation hopes its products will be commercialised through small and medium scale entrepreneurs and even multinational companies. Royalties will be paid to innovators.
Ramesh Patel, secretary sristi, feels the reason researchers are not able to come up with products is because of the haphazard research. They do not have a database but screen every plant they feel may work. Instead, researchers would do better if they would work with farmers. "The farmers should be consulted in the decision-making process. Com-munication should be kept open at all stages," says Patel.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.