Has the CSIR been a backbencher in the field of scientific research in India?
THE Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR) has announced the winners of the coveted Shanti Swarup
Bhatnagar Awards for the 'year 1995, in
Delhi on September 26. These awards
were announced by R A Mashelkar,
director general, CSIR, marking the csiR
Foundation Day - the 53rd anniversary of the formation of the country's
apex scientific research body.
Eleven eminent scientists from across the country have been selected
for these awards for their achievement
in 7 areas of research. In additicz
budding CSIR scientists were given
CSIR Young Scientist Awards in
of research. The CSIR Technoji
awards given to institutions under
CSIR were also announced.
The Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar
Awards, named after the founder-
director-general, CSIR, are given
scientists of Indian origin below
years of age, for their outstanckw
research contributions in India. The
awards are considered to be the Ingwo
form of recognition for Indian sci"Vla
tists. But ironically, not a single M
scientist's name figured in the list of
although the CSIR is among the large
science & technology organisation
the country with about 5,600 science
and boasts of leaping into the
tury through competitive research
Instead, the Indian Institute of Scic
(rise), Bangalore, bagged 5 out
awards. Asked why csiii scientists
not make it, Mashelkar said, "We
I or 2 awards every year. I am
awardee myself. Once in a while,
may miss out, but our scient
often found hovering among the top
few. That issignificantin itself.. On
whole, I am happy about the awards
he said.
Obviously, the CSIR has not been
major performer in the competitive
even on the basis of a cumulatrft
record. Asked about the usc's perf"
mance, Mashelkar said, "The usc h
been a winner by tradition, berrigm
institution which has the cumulative
record of winning the largest numbeo
Bhatnagar Awards. The moment you
enter the usc, you run into someone
who won the award," he said.
One could argue that although is
CSIR may be lagging behind in haw
research, it has a better record is
technology. But, this year's rothng
shield for process technology and pn
for biological sciences and technolop
have gone unawarded, indicating
lack of competitive performance between the csiR labs. However
Mashelkar opines, "The procedure is
very rigorous. We have the toughest
possible committees, with 10 to
members each, drawn from among the
best in the country."
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.