In a landmark judgement, the High Court in London ruled against the British Geological Survey (BGS) in the claim brought by victims of arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh. The claimants contended that the BGS was negligent in its failure to test for arsenic when it carried out a survey in 1992 on the toxicity of Bangladesh's groundwater (see: "Hoping for relief", April 30, 2003). The defendant argued that it did not owe a duty of care of the victims. While dismissing this plea, the judge concluded that the case raised a novel point in the law pertaining to the reliance of technical reports. With this win, victims can file cases for compensation.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.