Central Ground Water Authority had said the order could amount to judicial overreach
The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking a review of its order, directing the Central and state governments to expedite the controversial project to interlink rivers to transfer water from water surplus areas to water deficit regions. The review petition was filed by the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) and said that the court order dated February 27 could be interpreted as judicial overreach.
At the same time, the apex court bench of Chief Justice S H Kapadia, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice A K Patnaik refused permission for filing of a similar review petition by 21 eminent citizens. The bench, in its order on September 26, said both petitions were delayed and lacked merit.
On February 27, the court had asked the Central and state governments to expedite the neccessary feasibility reports and detailed project reports for the 30 links that would connect various rivers. The judgement upheld the importance of interlinking of rivers in view of the paradoxical situation wherein floods and droughts occur at almost the same time in different parts of the country.
Some states oppose river interlinking
Most states have agreed to cooperate with Central government to expedite the projects but the problems arising from them, like rehabilitation and resettlement of the people to be displaced, are yet to be resolved. The National Advisory Council was entrusted with making the draft national policy on resettlement and rehabilitation.
Some states like Kerala and Karnataka have, however, have opposed the projects. Karnataka is yet to grant permission for the Bedti-Varada and Netravati-Hemavati-Tapi links. The state government even opposed feasibility study of these river links due to cases relating to water sharing pending in other courts. This was noted by the apex court in its February order.
Kerala has staunchly opposed the long distance inter-basin transfer of river water in the state, saying the state needs water to maintain its intricate network of natural and manmade channels and supply water for irrigation and drinking. The Supreme Court in its judgement had observed the state's hesitation in implementing the project because it experiences severe water scarcity during summer and off monsoon months. The court had earlier noted that even states like Uttar Pradesh have not granted comprehensive approvals for projects such as the Ken-Betwa link (See 'Projects in limbo').
The February judgement, however, allows the amicus curiae Ranjith Kumar to file a contempt plea if the orders of the court are violated by either the states or the Central government. The court has also appointed a committee, comprising experts from Ministry of Water Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Environment and Forests, social activists and others to speedily execute the project.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.