Transport ministry wants early review of National Auto Fuel Policy to highlight obstacles
a fresh controversy has erupted regarding the implementation of the National Auto Fuel policy. Union minister of shipping, road transport and highways T R Baalu, in a letter to Union minister of petroleum and natural gas Mani Shankar Aiyar, has demanded a review of the policy's implementation be preponed. The review is scheduled for 2006 in the policy, cleared by the Union cabinet in October 2003.
From April 1, 2005, 11 Indian cities will move to Euro iii levels while the rest of the country moves to Euro ii levels. "Implementing the Euro iii norms in 11 cities looks like an uphill task. We have written the letter to bring forward the review and so avoid a similar situation while implementing Euro iii across the country and Euro iv in 11 cities, so that institutions have the necessary time to meet the deadline," says a senior official of the Union ministry of shipping, road transport and highways (mosrth). Thus, the mosrth is trying to hasten the process of implementation of the auto fuel policy roadmap. It is noteworthy that the Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority for the National Capital Region had recently held discussions with the ministry over preponing the fuel policy roadmap.
The development has highlighted another issue. How did the review find its place in the final policy when it wasn't a part of the expert committee recommendations? "The government thought it would be better to have a review before the roadmap is implemented in its fuller sense. So, it added the clause when the Cabinet cleared it," reveals a senior oil industry official.
The national oil companies blame the Reliance Industries for delaying the roadmap. "Reliance has actually written to the ministry saying that it was not aware of the auto fuel policy deadline, because no formal communication was established on the roadmap," says an oil industry official. But Prabh Das, joint secretary, mopng , asserts: "Nothing doing. We have already sounded them that we cannot alter the roadmap. Moreover they are free to import if need be. They have to meet the deadline." Such a situation for the industry shouldn't have arisen in the first place. Refineries had one-and-a-half years to comply with the new norms.
In fact, the expert committee on auto fuel policy had recommended fiscal incentives. But the Union cabinet held that refineries did not need them. The then petroleum minister Ram Naik said fiscal incentives could only be given in the annual budget. "There is no question of fiscal incentives. Funds are not a problem. Moreover, they are passing on the cost to the consumers," argues a senior planning commission official. These arguments and counter arguments do little in clearing the uncertainity over the implementation of improved standards.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.