Out of the 13 billion single-use plastic bottles annually bought in the UK, only 50 per cent are recycled
Plastic pollution is making the Arctic ecosystem even more fragile, reveals a new analysis by experts on ocean currents from the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London. One of the main contributors to plastic pollution is the UK as large fraction of its plastic waste ends up in the ocean. Marine organisms are either poisoned when they mistake plastic waste for food and consume it or get tangled in floating plastic.
Evidence of ocean plastic pollution
"From seabirds caught in loops of plastic packaging to polystyrene particles blocking the digestive systems of fish, plastic causes a continuous path of destruction from surface to seafloor,” said Erik van Sebille, who led the team of researchers. Sebille is convinced that the UK is contributing to the problem as he has tracked the path of the UK’s plastic waste using ‘PlasticAdrift.org’, a tool his team has designed to track ocean currents.
After the plastics from the coastlines are being flushed into the sea, much of it that doesn’t wash back onto the beach or sink to the ocean floor drifts towards the Barents Sea, off the northern coasts of Norway, before reaching the Arctic. Heating up of the Arctic Ocean due to climate change has already put wildlife and fish under stress and this plastic pollution is making the situation worse.
In November 2015, researchers from the Alfred Wegener Institute and Belgium’s Laboratory for Polar Ecology observed 31 pieces of plastic afloat on the Barents Sea and Fram Strait. Since they were viewed from a helicopter, the observers couldn’t see the smaller pieces.
Scale of the problem
The Grantham Briefing Paper produced by the team described ocean plastic pollution as “an alarming issue due to its persistence, complexity, steady growth and the pervasive impacts it has on all aspects of ecosystems”.
Ocean plastic pollution garnering global attention
The members of G7 block released a statement in 2015. It clearly called for “reducing and further regulating man‐made pollution of the sea” and “ending overfishing and preserving marine biodiversity and ecosystem function through research‐based management”. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has also been at the forefront of leading an initiative on marine litter.
Solutions at hand
The Grantham Institute briefing paper, produced by Sebille, along with Charikleia Spathi and Alyssa Gilbert, recommends a holistic approach and a focus on social, behavioural, chemical and engineering solutions. It also suggests management of plastic waste at source by raising awareness among the public of the harm caused by plastic pollution.
Using alternatives where possible could be another solution, according to the researchers. However, biodegradable plastics may not be a solution, according to Jacqueline McGlade, chief scientist at the UNEP. “They are not buoyant, so they’re going to sink, so they’re not going to be exposed to UV and break down,” said McGlade. In fact, biodegradable plastics break down completely only when they are subjected to temperatures above 50°C. Such conditions are only available in an industrial composter and not in the marine environment.
While the Grantham Institute report calls for boosting recycling, it also recommends incinerating unrecyclable plastic waste for energy.
UK government’s response
Microbeads, tiny plastic balls used in personal care products, end up in oceans once they are rinsed down the drain. Small fish eat these beads by mistaking them for food. What is even more precarious is the fact that tens of millions of beads are entering the oceans because the beads are too small for the water treatment plants to filter them out. The UK government has been talking about banning it for few years.
Ahead of the Brexit referendum, UK environment minister George Eustice had stated that government fully backs a legal ban on manufacturing plastic microbeads. Stating that the UK government was working with other EU countries to push the agenda at a pan-European level, he had said that the government would go ahead and introduce a national ban even if a ban across the EU is not passed as early as 2017 to stop the particles from entering the seas.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.