This month, the history department at Middlebury College, a small private institution in New England, voted to ban students from citing Wikpedia in academic work. Other us academic institutes also forbid students from using Wikipedia as their central source.
But a search of court decisions by the New York Times showed up that more than 100 us court rulings have cited the online encyclopedia since 2004, including 13 from the circuit court of appeals, one rung beneath the supreme court.
In a 2005 case before the Tennessee court of appeals, worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, the site was used to help define the meaning of the word "beverage". It was also cited recently in a federal district court in Florida to offer background on the term "booty music", the New York Times said.
In one instance cited by the newspaper, a decision from a Chicago appeals court cited Wikipedia in a drugs case, even though the judge, Richard Posner, had first-hand experience of its unreliability. One entry had said the conservative commentator Ann Coulter had been his law clerk. Posner has never met her.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
.png)
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.